{"id":68143,"date":"2006-10-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-10-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/10\/29\/le-rapport-stern-la-chose-est-vraiment-importante\/"},"modified":"2006-10-29T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-10-29T00:00:00","slug":"le-rapport-stern-la-chose-est-vraiment-importante","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/10\/29\/le-rapport-stern-la-chose-est-vraiment-importante\/","title":{"rendered":"Le rapport Stern : la chose est vraiment importante"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les choix des journaux pour la place, notamment graphique, qu’ils accordent aux informations est une pr\u00e9cieuse indication de l’importance notamment qu’on accorde \u00e0 cette information. Vendredi, The Independent<\/em> faisait son premier titre sur le rapport Stern<\/a>, traitant du co\u00fbt astronomique de la crise climatique pour l’\u00e9conomie mondiale. Le fait que The Observer<\/em> reprenne cette affaire<\/a> sans apporter quelque chose de fondamentalement nouveau par rapport \u00e0 The Independent<\/em>, et qu’il lui donne \u00e9galement la place de manchette sur sa page une est une indication pr\u00e9cise.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tEn bonne logique journalistique, The Independent<\/em> ayant eu l’information, The Observer<\/em> n’aurait pas d\u00fb la mettre si fortement en \u00e9vidence. S’il le fait, c’est que la nouvelle est tr\u00e8s importante et ressentie comme telle dans les milieux du pouvoir \u00e0 Londres. Un journal comme The Guardian<\/em> est aussi attentif \u00e0 cela. Il y a l\u00e0 un signe de plus de la tr\u00e8s grande importance accord\u00e9e \u00e0 Londres au rapport Stern.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abBritons face the prospect of a welter of new green taxes to tackle climate change, as the most authoritative report on global warming warns it will cost the world up to \u00a33.68 trillion unless it is tackled within a decade.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe review by Sir Nicholas Stern, commissioned by the Chancellor of the Exchequer and published tomorrow, marks a crucial point in the debate by underlining how failure to act would trigger a catastrophic global recession. Unchecked climate change would turn 200 million people into refugees, the largest migration in modern history, as their homes succumbed to drought or flood.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbStern also warns that a successor to the Kyoto agreement on cutting greenhouse gas emissions should be signed next year, not by 2010\/11 as planned. He forecasts that the world needs to spend 1 per cent of global GDP equivalent to about \u00a3184bn dealing with climate change now, or face a bill between five and 20 times higher for damage caused by letting it continue. Unchecked climate change could thus cost as much as \u00a3566 for every man, woman and child now on the planet roughly 6.5 billion people.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe 700-page report argues that an international framework on climate change covering the globe will be necessary, and that different countries may opt to reduce emissions differently. Options range from many more green taxes to carbon trading.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbStern’s verdict will create fierce political debate, with a growing belief in government that taxes on activities such as driving or flying will have to rise.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 29 octobre 2006 \u00e0 10H22<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les choix des journaux pour la place, notamment graphique, qu’ils accordent aux informations est une pr\u00e9cieuse indication de l’importance notamment qu’on accorde \u00e0 cette information. Vendredi, The Independent faisait son premier titre sur le rapport Stern, traitant du co\u00fbt astronomique de la crise climatique pour l’\u00e9conomie mondiale. Le fait que The Observer reprenne cette affaire… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3392,3228,3393,6051],"class_list":["post-68143","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-climatique","tag-crise","tag-environnement","tag-stern"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68143","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68143"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68143\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68143"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68143"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}