{"id":68183,"date":"2006-11-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-11-08T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/08\/les-symptomes-de-la-crise\/"},"modified":"2006-11-08T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-11-08T00:00:00","slug":"les-symptomes-de-la-crise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/08\/les-symptomes-de-la-crise\/","title":{"rendered":"Les sympt\u00f4mes de la crise"},"content":{"rendered":"

Des \u00e9chantillonnages de votants am\u00e9ricains ont \u00e9t\u00e9 interrog\u00e9s sur les raisons de leurs votes par plusieurs instituts et organisations. Il y a au moins deux signes puissants qui t\u00e9moignent de la profondeur de la crise am\u00e9ricaniste, se manifestant comme d’habitude par l’opposition entre le centre (Washington) et le pays.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes sondages et enqu\u00eates ont \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9alis\u00e9s par CNN et un r\u00e9sum\u00e9 en a \u00e9t\u00e9 publi\u00e9 ce matin<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Le premier point est que les principales raisons des votes sont nationales et non locales. L’Am\u00e9rique n’a pas vot\u00e9 provincial, contrairement \u00e0 ce qu’annon\u00e7ait l’analyse du petit prince BHL<\/a> refl\u00e9tant \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard le sentiment g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, elle a vot\u00e9 selon ses pr\u00e9occupations de l’\u00e9tat structurel du pays, de sa direction et de sa politique. (Il est encore plus remarquable que cette attitude se manifeste \u00e0 propos du vote sur la Chambre, vote qui devrait \u00eatre local par d\u00e9finition en raison de la proximit\u00e9 des d\u00e9put\u00e9s de leurs \u00e9lecteurs : \u00abAnd defying the traditional political maxim that all politics is local, 62 percent of voters said national issues mattered more than local issues when deciding which House candidate to pick.<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Le second point est que la premi\u00e8re pr\u00e9occupation des \u00e9lecteurs, encore plus que l’Irak, c’est la corruption du syst\u00e8me. C’est encore plus significatif : la pr\u00e9occupation de l’\u00e9lecteur va \u00e0 un fait structurel fondamental du syst\u00e8me (la corruption) et non \u00e0 un de ses produits ext\u00e9rieurs (l’Irak).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abBy a wide margin, Americans who voted Tuesday in the midterm election say they disapprove of the war in Iraq. But when asked which issue was extremely important to their vote, more voters said corruption and ethics in government than any other issue, including the war, according to national exit polls.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAsked which issues were extremely important to their vote, 42 percent said corruption and ethics; 40 percent, terrorism; 39 percent, the economy; 37 percent, Iraq; 36 percent, values; and 29 percent, illegal immigration.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 8 novembre 2006 \u00e0 15H19<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Des \u00e9chantillonnages de votants am\u00e9ricains ont \u00e9t\u00e9 interrog\u00e9s sur les raisons de leurs votes par plusieurs instituts et organisations. Il y a au moins deux signes puissants qui t\u00e9moignent de la profondeur de la crise am\u00e9ricaniste, se manifestant comme d’habitude par l’opposition entre le centre (Washington) et le pays. Les sondages et enqu\u00eates ont \u00e9t\u00e9… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3858,3228,6109,6110,6111],"class_list":["post-68183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-corruption","tag-crise","tag-mid-term","tag-symptomes","tag-votants"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68183","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68183"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68183\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}