{"id":68196,"date":"2006-11-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-11-12T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/12\/mais-ne-pas-oublier-hillary-hawk-et-les-democrates-bellicistes\/"},"modified":"2006-11-12T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-11-12T00:00:00","slug":"mais-ne-pas-oublier-hillary-hawk-et-les-democrates-bellicistes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/12\/mais-ne-pas-oublier-hillary-hawk-et-les-democrates-bellicistes\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2026 Mais ne pas oublier Hillary <em>Hawk<\/em> et les d\u00e9mocrates bellicistes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Apr\u00e8s avoir lu l&rsquo;\u00e9ventuelle tactique que pourraient utiliser des adversaires d&rsquo;une possible attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran, d&rsquo;apr\u00e8s les <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3361\" class=\"gen\">propositions de Daniel Ellsberg<\/a>, il faut ajouter un aspect important qui est le comportement des d\u00e9mocrates. Ellsberg ne dissimule d&rsquo;ailleurs pas, sans l&rsquo;aborder vraiment, le fait qu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;est nullement assur\u00e9 que les d\u00e9mocrates soient hostiles \u00e0 une attaque.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tHier, dans un article <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/2006\/11\/10\/news\/edpfaff.php\" class=\"gen\">d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9voqu\u00e9 ici<\/a>, William Pfaff termine sa r\u00e9flexion o\u00f9 il note l&rsquo;hostilit\u00e9 des Europ\u00e9ens \u00e0 la politique am\u00e9ricaniste en observant ceci :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>But the distrust seems mutual, even in unexpected places. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton now is attacking President George W. Bush for outsourcing American Iran policy to Europe  to Britain, France and Germany  and she demands that the United States stop Iran&rsquo;s assumed nuclear ambitions by whatever methods are necessary: All options on the table.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl est assur\u00e9 qu&rsquo;il existe un parti de la guerre chez les d\u00e9mocrates, y compris chez de tr\u00e8s importantes personnalit\u00e9s (outre Hillary, Joseph Biden par exemple). Sa filiation est riche, de Wilson \u00e0 la guerre du Viet-n\u00e2m, \u00e0 la guerre du Kosovo. Le cas Hillary Clinton est r\u00e9v\u00e9lateur, puisqu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;une personnalit\u00e9 nettement \u00e0 gauche qui a souvent consid\u00e9r\u00e9 l&rsquo;intervention arm\u00e9e comme une n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 humanitaire, \u00e0 l&rsquo;exemple de nombre de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3177\" class=\"gen\">lib\u00e9raux<\/a> de la sorte. Hillary s&rsquo;est affirm\u00e9e <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=1556\" class=\"gen\">va-t&rsquo;en-guerre<\/a>, a sembl\u00e9 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3315\" class=\"gen\">virer de bord<\/a> durant la campagne \u00e9lectorale mais semble revenir sur son ancienne position comme l&rsquo;indique Pfaff.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEn aucun cas on ne peut dire que la pr\u00e9sence d&rsquo;une majorit\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate au Congr\u00e8s, avec des leaders comme Hillary Clinton, constitue quelque assurance que ce soit contre une attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran. Ellsberg a encore du pain sur la planche.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 12 novembre 2006 \u00e0 08H27<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Apr\u00e8s avoir lu l&rsquo;\u00e9ventuelle tactique que pourraient utiliser des adversaires d&rsquo;une possible attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran, d&rsquo;apr\u00e8s les propositions de Daniel Ellsberg, il faut ajouter un aspect important qui est le comportement des d\u00e9mocrates. Ellsberg ne dissimule d&rsquo;ailleurs pas, sans l&rsquo;aborder vraiment, le fait qu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;est nullement assur\u00e9 que les d\u00e9mocrates soient hostiles \u00e0 une attaque.&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3009,3147,3278,2773],"class_list":["post-68196","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-democrates","tag-ellsberg","tag-hillary","tag-iran"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68196","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68196"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68196\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68196"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}