{"id":68214,"date":"2006-11-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-11-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/19\/stealthy-gw-de-toutes-les-facons-dad-avait-tout-dit\/"},"modified":"2006-11-19T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-11-19T00:00:00","slug":"stealthy-gw-de-toutes-les-facons-dad-avait-tout-dit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/19\/stealthy-gw-de-toutes-les-facons-dad-avait-tout-dit\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cStealthy<\/em>\u201d GW, \u2014 de toutes les fa\u00e7ons, Dad<\/em> avait tout dit"},"content":{"rendered":"

Le voyage de GW en Asie devrait rester comme une tr\u00e8s grande performance en fait de rapidit\u00e9, de furtivit\u00e9 (stealth technology<\/em> ou low observable<\/em>), de profil tr\u00e8s bas, tout-terrain et passe-partout.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes Vietnamiens n’ont pas vu passer GW alors que le grand Bill (Clinton), six ans plus t\u00f4t, avait jou\u00e9 son num\u00e9ro jovial et \u00e9clatant qui avait conquis les foules. Le New York Times<\/em> constate<\/a> avec une amertume m\u00eame pas dissimul\u00e9e : \u00abAnd while the difference says much about the personalities of two presidents who both famously avoided serving in the war here, it reveals a lot about how significantly times have changed and perhaps why America’s public diplomacy seems unable to shift into gear.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe triste et terne Stephen Hadley, conseiller du pr\u00e9sident pour les questions de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale, a bien tent\u00e9 de convaincre la presse que les Vietnamiens n’oublieraient pas de sit\u00f4t GW. En fait, c’est peut-\u00eatre vrai Reste \u00e0 voir pourquoi.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abOn Saturday, Mr. Bush’s national security adviser, Stephen J. Hadley, conceded that the president had not come into direct contact with ordinary Vietnamese, but said that they connected anyway.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIf you’d been part of the president’s motorcade as we’ve shuttled back and forth, he said, reporters would have seen that the president has been doing a lot of waving and getting a lot of waving and smiles.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbHe continued: I think he’s gotten a real sense of the warmth of the Vietnamese people and their willingness to put a very difficult period for both the United States and Vietnam behind them.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe plus significatif, avec ce qu’il faut de dr\u00f4lerie, est le mot de ce diplomate singapourien, apr\u00e8s la s\u00e9ance du sommet de l’association des pays asiatiques au cours de laquelle GW parla. Il mesure le niveau d’affligeante pauvret\u00e9 o\u00f9 est tomb\u00e9e la diplomatie am\u00e9ricaniste, au point o\u00f9 les journalistes en viennent \u00e0 risquer des remarques insolentes sur le public somnolent qui rate les consignes d’applaudissement : Bush \u00abspoke at his first stop, Singapore, promising that America will remain engaged in Asia. But the response was tepid the invited audience somehow missed several of built-in applause lines and one senior Singaporean diplomat, declining to be quoted by name, said there was little in the speech that his father didn’t say to us 15 years ago.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 19 novembre 2006 \u00e0 15H25<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le voyage de GW en Asie devrait rester comme une tr\u00e8s grande performance en fait de rapidit\u00e9, de furtivit\u00e9 (stealth technology ou low observable), de profil tr\u00e8s bas, tout-terrain et passe-partout. Les Vietnamiens n’ont pas vu passer GW alors que le grand Bill (Clinton), six ans plus t\u00f4t, avait jou\u00e9 son num\u00e9ro jovial et \u00e9clatant… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4418,3198,1342,1010],"class_list":["post-68214","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-discours","tag-gw","tag-singapour","tag-vietnam"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68214","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68214"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68214\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68214"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68214"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}