{"id":68215,"date":"2006-11-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-11-20T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/20\/refus-determine-et-notablement-scandalise-de-la-realite\/"},"modified":"2006-11-20T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-11-20T00:00:00","slug":"refus-determine-et-notablement-scandalise-de-la-realite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/20\/refus-determine-et-notablement-scandalise-de-la-realite\/","title":{"rendered":"Refus d\u00e9termin\u00e9 et notablement scandalis\u00e9 de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Parmi les retomb\u00e9es des \u00e9lections am\u00e9ricaines du 7 novembre, on trouve, de plus en plus exprim\u00e9 de fa\u00e7on concr\u00e8te et d\u00e9taill\u00e9e, le sentiment que William Pfaff mettait hier <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3376\" class=\"gen\">en \u00e9vidence<\/a>. Le refus complet de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, notamment pour ce qui concerne l&rsquo;Irak, et le pi\u00e8ge mortel qui en r\u00e9sulte. Les deux appr\u00e9ciations qu&rsquo;on signale ici constituent indirectement une description s\u00e9rieuse et minutieuse du r\u00e8gne incontest\u00e9 du virtualisme \u00e0 Washington, et renfor\u00e7ant dans le sens de l&rsquo;inqui\u00e9tude extr\u00eamement forte la question angoiss\u00e9e qui terminait l&rsquo;article de Pfaff, apr\u00e8s que ce dernier ait constat\u00e9 que nous nous trouvons tous coinc\u00e9s dans ce <em>virtual world<\/em>\u00bb : \u00ab<em>how do we leave?<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  Il y a d&rsquo;abord ce message l\u00e9g\u00e8rement incr\u00e9dule et fortement inquiet de Lakhdar Brahimi, le diplomate alg\u00e9rien qui supervisa, pour le compte de l&rsquo;ONU, le premier transfert de souverainet\u00e9 en Irak des USA vers un organisme irakien, en 2003. Si Brahimi envisage les moyens de tenter d&rsquo;am\u00e9liorer la situation en Irak, et cela ne pouvant se faire qu&rsquo;avec l&rsquo;annonce d&rsquo;un retrait complet des Anglo-Saxons, il insiste surtout (dans <a href=\"http:\/\/news.independent.co.uk\/world\/middle_east\/article1998886.ece\" class=\"gen\">The Independent<\/a> ce jour) sur l&rsquo;incapacit\u00e9 de ces m\u00eames Anglo-Saxons (des am\u00e9ricanistes) de seulement envisager que la politique US puisse \u00eatre un \u00e9chec, et qu&rsquo;elle puisse \u00eatre mise en \u00e9chec. Ce cas d&rsquo;autisme est effectivement du pur virtualisme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Iraq needs a new government to begin a process of national reconciliation leading to the withdrawal of foreign troops, because the US, Britain and Iraqi leaders are in a state of denial about their failed policy, a former UN envoy to the country says. There is a refusal to accept that the so-called process is not working. It collapsed a long time ago. They should sit down and put something else up. What we need is a serious attempt at national reconciliation that has never taken place<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  Le second \u00e9l\u00e9ment concerne un rapport que vient de publier le Oxford Research Group (ORG), sous la direction du Professeur Paul Rogers, consultant de l&rsquo;ORG et professeur de Peace Studies \u00e0 l&rsquo;universit\u00e9 de Bradford. Rogers analyse les conditions actuelles en Irak et dans la r\u00e9gion du point de vue conventionnel des int\u00e9r\u00eats g\u00e9opolitiques et conclut que ces int\u00e9r\u00eats existent toujours, pour les USA notamment, pour rester dans la r\u00e9gion. (Rogers nous annonce que la <em>Global War On Terror<\/em> durera au moins encore 30 ans) Surtout, il pronostique l&rsquo;absence compl\u00e8te tr\u00e8s probable de changement de politique aux USA, bien au-del\u00e0 de GW Bush. Le <em>Guardian<\/em>, qui nous fait rapport <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/uklatest\/story\/0,,-6227067,00.html\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a> sur cette affaire, apporte ces pr\u00e9cisions.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>What was needed was a complete reassessment of current policies, the report said. However, Prof Rogers&rsquo; said this was unlikely to happen, because even with the Democrats now controlling both houses, there was virtually no commitment to full withdrawal from Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Instead, Prof Rogers&rsquo; report found that while there were various moves to modify policy, such as withdrawing from the cities and maintaining a presence in a few bases, nothing amounted to substantial change.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Commenting on the changes needed, Prof Rogers said: Most people believe that the recent elections mark the beginning of the end of the Bush era, but that does not apply to the war on terror. In reality there will be little change until the United States faces up to the need for a fundamental rethink of its policies. So far, even with the election results, there is no real sign of that.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 20 novembre 2006 \u00e0 04H29<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Parmi les retomb\u00e9es des \u00e9lections am\u00e9ricaines du 7 novembre, on trouve, de plus en plus exprim\u00e9 de fa\u00e7on concr\u00e8te et d\u00e9taill\u00e9e, le sentiment que William Pfaff mettait hier en \u00e9vidence. Le refus complet de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, notamment pour ce qui concerne l&rsquo;Irak, et le pi\u00e8ge mortel qui en r\u00e9sulte. Les deux appr\u00e9ciations qu&rsquo;on signale ici&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[857,5899,610],"class_list":["post-68215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-irak","tag-realite","tag-virtualisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68215"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68215\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}