{"id":68229,"date":"2006-11-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-11-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/23\/complot-pour-la-paix\/"},"modified":"2006-11-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-11-23T00:00:00","slug":"complot-pour-la-paix","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/23\/complot-pour-la-paix\/","title":{"rendered":"Complot pour la paix ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Selon Tom Hayden, ancien activiste c\u00e9l\u00e8bre du mouvement anti-guerre durant la guerre du Viet-n\u00e2m, devenu depuis parlementaire radical (Californie) et chroniqueur ind\u00e9pendant, il y a effectivement un processus secret tendant \u00e0 des d\u00e9cisions radicales en Irak, avec retrait US, installation d&rsquo;un nouveau pouvoir, retour (avant la fin de l&rsquo;ann\u00e9e) sur la sc\u00e8ne politique irakienne de Tarek Aziz, l&rsquo;ancien ministre des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res de Saddam. Baker, qui serait le machiniste de ce complot essentiellement avec des Irakiens et des Jordaniens, compterait sur Aziz pour rallier les Sunnites et le parti Baas clandestin \u00e0 un nouvel arrangement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tRice (elle est rest\u00e9e proche de Bush-p\u00e8re et, par cons\u00e9quent, de Baker) participerait \u00e0 cette affaire. Au moins un d\u00e9tail donn\u00e9 par Hayden sonne presque incontestable tant il restitue l&rsquo;atmosph\u00e8re d&rsquo;affrontement interne de l&rsquo;administration GW : <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice personally appealed to the Gulf Cooperation Council in October to serve as intermediaries between the US and armed Sunni resistance groups [not including al Qaeda], communicating a US willingness to negotiate with them at any time or place. Speaking in early October, Rice joked that if then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld heard me now, he would wage a war on me fiercer and hotter than he waged on Iraq, according to an Arab diplomat privy to the closed session.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tHayden, dont le texte est repris sur <a href=\"http:\/\/www.informationclearinghouse.info\/article15709.htm\" class=\"gen\">Information Clearing House<\/a> ce 22 novembre, termine par un commentaire plut\u00f4t ambigu quant au cr\u00e9dit qu&rsquo;il faut apporter aux perspectives de paix, ou d&rsquo;arrangement dans tous les cas, ainsi ouvertes :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>It must be emphasized that there is no reason to believe that these US gestures are anything more than probes, in the historic spirit of divide-and-conquer, before escalating the Iraq war in a Baghdad offensive. Denial plausibility  aka Machiavellian secrecy  remains American security policy, for understandable if undemocratic reasons.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Yet Americans who voted in the November election because of a deep belief that a change of government in Washington might end the war have a right to know that their votes counted. The US has not abandoned its entire strategy in Iraq, but is offering significant concessions without its own citizens knowing.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 23 novembre 2006 \u00e0 08H58<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Selon Tom Hayden, ancien activiste c\u00e9l\u00e8bre du mouvement anti-guerre durant la guerre du Viet-n\u00e2m, devenu depuis parlementaire radical (Californie) et chroniqueur ind\u00e9pendant, il y a effectivement un processus secret tendant \u00e0 des d\u00e9cisions radicales en Irak, avec retrait US, installation d&rsquo;un nouveau pouvoir, retour (avant la fin de l&rsquo;ann\u00e9e) sur la sc\u00e8ne politique irakienne de&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6160,4094,4926,6158,857,6157,3306,6159],"class_list":["post-68229","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-aziz","tag-baker","tag-complot","tag-hayden","tag-irak","tag-paix","tag-rice","tag-tarek"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68229","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68229"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68229\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68229"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68229"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68229"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}