{"id":68231,"date":"2006-11-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-11-24T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/24\/les-sinuosites-de-john-mccain\/"},"modified":"2006-11-24T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-11-24T00:00:00","slug":"les-sinuosites-de-john-mccain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/11\/24\/les-sinuosites-de-john-mccain\/","title":{"rendered":"Les sinuosit\u00e9s de John McCain"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le s\u00e9nateur r\u00e9publicain de l&rsquo;Arizona John McCain semble devoir se lancer dans la course \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sidence,  mais rien n&rsquo;est encore assur\u00e9. Ses prises de position sur l&rsquo;Irak sont toujours d&rsquo;une fermet\u00e9 exemplaire (en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, plus radicales que celles de l&rsquo;administration puisqu&rsquo;il recommande l&rsquo;envoi de troupes suppl\u00e9mentaires)  mais rien n&rsquo;est assur\u00e9 l\u00e0 non plus, selon les voeux du peuple am\u00e9ricain. Les sinuosit\u00e9s nouvelles du futur possible-candidat sont exemplaires de l&#8217;embarras o\u00f9 la situation politique place aujourd&rsquo;hui tout candidat \u00e0 une haute fonction aux Etats-Unis.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCes remarques publi\u00e9es le 22 novembre dans <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/washington\/2006-11-22-candidates-iraq-2008_x.htm?csp=34\" class=\"gen\">USA Today<\/a> sont tr\u00e8s r\u00e9v\u00e9latrices \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard,  qui nous disent, de la part de John McCain, que, plus que jamais, il faut des forces suppl\u00e9mentaires en Irak et que la victoire est possible, mais que, peut-\u00eatre, envoyer des forces suppl\u00e9mentaires ne sera pas possible si les Am\u00e9ricains ne le veulent pas,  et qu&rsquo;alors, les choses seront bien, malgr\u00e9 tout, si John McCain est \u00e9lu<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>And then there&rsquo;s Sen. John McCain.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>I believe victory is still attainable, the Arizona Republican says. But without additional combat forces we will not win this war.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>In carefully scripted language, McCain then adds: If the country does not have the will to do what it takes to win in Iraq  send in more forces  then U.S. troops should not be made to serve more tours of duty.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>As troubling as it is, I can ask a young Marine to go back to Iraq, he said last week. What I cannot do is ask him to return to Iraq, to risk life and limb, so that we might delay our defeat for a few months or a year. That is more to ask than patriotism requires.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>It would be immoral, and I could not do it, the former Vietnam prisoner of war added.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Nuanced and multifaceted, McCain&rsquo;s position puts him in conflict with President George W. Bush, most fellow Republicans and, so far, with many of his would-be White House rivals should he run for president.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The stance has allowed McCain, a staunch supporter of the war, to distance himself dramatically from how Bush has handled the conflict.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>But the position also places the Arizona senator at odds with a majority of the country, which has grown increasingly frustrated with the nearly four-year-old war that has cost more than US$350 billion and resulted in the deaths of nearly 2,900 U.S. military personnel.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 24 novembre 2006 \u00e0 09H10<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le s\u00e9nateur r\u00e9publicain de l&rsquo;Arizona John McCain semble devoir se lancer dans la course \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sidence, mais rien n&rsquo;est encore assur\u00e9. Ses prises de position sur l&rsquo;Irak sont toujours d&rsquo;une fermet\u00e9 exemplaire (en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, plus radicales que celles de l&rsquo;administration puisqu&rsquo;il recommande l&rsquo;envoi de troupes suppl\u00e9mentaires) mais rien n&rsquo;est assur\u00e9 l\u00e0 non plus, selon&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4063,3340,6162],"class_list":["post-68231","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-mccain","tag-presidentielles","tag-sinuosites"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68231","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68231"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68231\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68231"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68231"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68231"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}