{"id":68300,"date":"2006-12-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-12-13T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/13\/israel-a-la-bombe-dit-olmert-par-inadvertance-ou-intentionnellement\/"},"modified":"2006-12-13T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-12-13T00:00:00","slug":"israel-a-la-bombe-dit-olmert-par-inadvertance-ou-intentionnellement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/13\/israel-a-la-bombe-dit-olmert-par-inadvertance-ou-intentionnellement\/","title":{"rendered":"Isra\u00ebl a la bombe, dit Olmert, \u2014 par inadvertance ou intentionnellement?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>C&rsquo;est au cours d&rsquo;une \u00e9mission d&rsquo;un cha\u00eene de t\u00e9l\u00e9vision allemande que le Premier ministre isra\u00e9lien Elmut Olmert a admis qu&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl avait la bombe nucl\u00e9aire. Une gaffe ou une d\u00e9claration intentionnelle? L&rsquo;interpr\u00e9tation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale est celle d&rsquo;une gaffe, ce qui montre le peu d&rsquo;estime qu&rsquo;on cultive pour la ma\u00eetrise du Premier ministre isra\u00e9lien. Le <em>Guardian<\/em> rapporte <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/israel\/Story\/0,,1970861,00.html\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a> l&rsquo;incident :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Israel&rsquo;s prime minister, Ehud Olmert, was yesterday trying to fend off accusations of ineptitude and calls for his resignation after he accidentally acknowledged for the first time that Israel had nuclear weapons.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb[Olmert] <em>told Germany&rsquo;s Sat.1 channel on Monday evening: Iran, openly, explicitly and publicly, threatens to wipe Israel off the map. Can you say that this is the same level, when they are aspiring to have nuclear weapons, as America, France,<\/em> <strong><em>Israel<\/em><\/strong> <em>and Russia?<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t[On observera un autre lapsus  sans aucun doute involontaire, celui-l\u00e0,  qui en dit long sur la consid\u00e9ration que les Isra\u00e9liens ont de la <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3444\" class=\"gen\">puissance nucl\u00e9aire<\/a> britannique. Citant les puissances nucl\u00e9aires majeures, tant techniquement que politiquement, Olmert en cite quatre, dont la France mais pas le Royaume-Uni.]<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUne autre interpr\u00e9tation (que la gaffe) est donn\u00e9e \u00e0 propos de la d\u00e9claration de Olmert. Elle vient de Mordechai Vanunu, ancien technicien nucl\u00e9aire devenu dissident, qui a donn\u00e9 le premier (en 1968) des d\u00e9tails sur les capacit\u00e9s nucl\u00e9aires d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl (qu&rsquo;il situe comme sixi\u00e8me puissance nucl\u00e9aire du monde) et qui milite depuis contre la nucl\u00e9arisation d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<em>Mr Vanunu, who was released in 2004 after spending 18 years in prison, welcomed the prime minister&rsquo;s admission. Obviously, I don&rsquo;t welcome the atomic bomb but this openness could lead at last to some realpolitik  and maybe to some real peace. Mr Vanunu said he believed the admission was not accidental. My idea is that it was said intentionally. For 20 years they tried to deny me and my story but the policy of cheating and lying didn&rsquo;t succeed. There is now a new defence secretary in the United States and there are also changes taking place in the Arab world, so I think that may have led to the change.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes arguments de Vanunu sont certainement discutables. Certains peuvent les juger \u00e9tranges, notamment la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence \u00e0 l&rsquo;arriv\u00e9e de Gates. D&rsquo;autre part, on peut noter que Gates a montr\u00e9 une position inhabituellement compr\u00e9hensive des efforts nucl\u00e9aires des Iraniens en fonction de la bombe isra\u00e9lienne, dont il a dit implicitement qu&rsquo;elle existait : \u00ab<em>Robert Gates, speculating at a Senate confirmation hearing on Iran&rsquo;s possible motives for trying to build nuclear arms, suggested that Israel had the bomb.<\/em>\u00bb L&rsquo;interpr\u00e9tation ne peut \u00eatre compl\u00e8tement \u00e9cart\u00e9e. Elle correspond \u00e0 des informations dont Vanunu dispose, qui impliquent une autre analyse de la situation : un gouvernement isra\u00e9lien cherchant plut\u00f4t un compromis sur l&rsquo;affaire iranienne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 13 d\u00e9cembre \u00e0 06H45<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>C&rsquo;est au cours d&rsquo;une \u00e9mission d&rsquo;un cha\u00eene de t\u00e9l\u00e9vision allemande que le Premier ministre isra\u00e9lien Elmut Olmert a admis qu&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl avait la bombe nucl\u00e9aire. Une gaffe ou une d\u00e9claration intentionnelle? L&rsquo;interpr\u00e9tation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale est celle d&rsquo;une gaffe, ce qui montre le peu d&rsquo;estime qu&rsquo;on cultive pour la ma\u00eetrise du Premier ministre isra\u00e9lien. Le Guardian rapporte aujourd&rsquo;hui&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3984,2773,2774,3004,5632,6207],"class_list":["post-68300","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-gates","tag-iran","tag-israel","tag-nucleaire","tag-olmert","tag-vanunu"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68300","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68300"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68300\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68300"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68300"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68300"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}