{"id":68308,"date":"2006-12-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-12-14T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/14\/portrait-de-soldat-ii\/"},"modified":"2006-12-14T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-12-14T00:00:00","slug":"portrait-de-soldat-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/14\/portrait-de-soldat-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"Portrait de soldat (II)\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Sont-ils dans la m\u00eame r\u00e9alit\u00e9? De quelle r\u00e9alit\u00e9 parlons-nous ? Qu&rsquo;est-ce que \u00e7a, la r\u00e9alit\u00e9? Apr\u00e8s le lieutenant g\u00e9n\u00e9ral <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3477\" class=\"gen\">Chiarelli<\/a>, qui s&rsquo;\u00e9croule devant les journalistes, presque en larmes, \u00e0 son d\u00e9part d&rsquo;Irak, voici le brigadier g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Mark O. Schissler, de l&rsquo;Air Force (toujours U.S., <em>of course<\/em>). Changement complet de ton. L&rsquo;un s&rsquo;effondre, l&rsquo;autre tient droitement le monde dans ses mains. Avec Schissler, \u00e7a va marcher droit.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t Pardon, avec Schissler, c&rsquo;est la guerre apocalyptique, la guerre de cent ans, la guerre de tous les temps, avec cette angoisse du formidable guerrier du Pentagone : tiendront-ils, \u00e0 l&rsquo;arri\u00e8re, ces connards de civils? Car Schissler, lui, tient et tiendra le temps qu&rsquo;il faudra, 50, 100 ans, qu&rsquo;importe.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEcoutez donc les interrogations s\u00e9rieuses, contr\u00f4l\u00e9es et martiales du g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Schissler, de derri\u00e8re son bureau blind\u00e9 (\u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9preuve des v\u00e9hicules pi\u00e9g\u00e9s, type-<em>Improvised Explosive Devices<\/em>) du Pentagone. Car \u00ab<em>we&rsquo;re in a generational war<\/em>\u00bb et l&rsquo;important, \u00ab[it&rsquo;s] <em>to show the errors in Islamist extremist thinking<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tMorceaux de gloire dans le Washington <em>Times<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/national\/20061213-010657-5560r.htm\" class=\"gen\">13 d\u00e9cembre<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The American people need to prepare for a long-duration war against radical Muslims who are set to fight for 50 to 100 years to create an Islamist state in the region, a top Pentagon strategist in the war on terror says.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Air Force Brig. Gen. Mark O. Schissler said in an interview that the current strategy for fighting Islamists includes both military and ideological components that make it similar to the 40-year Cold War against communism.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>We&rsquo;re in a generational war. You can try and fight the enemy where they are and where they&rsquo;re attacking you, or prevent them and defend your own homeland, said Gen. Schissler, deputy director for the war on terrorism within the strategic plans office of the Pentagon&rsquo;s Joint Staff.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>But that&rsquo;s not enough to stop it. We&rsquo;ve got to break the chain, and that&rsquo;s &#8230; the ideology. We really need to show the errors in Islamist extremist thinking.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Gen. Schissler said he is concerned that Washington politics is weakening the will of the nation. I don&rsquo;t care about the politics. I care about people understanding the facts of what&rsquo;s our enemy is thinking about, what&rsquo;s our strategy to defeat them, and for [Americans] to understand that it will take a long fight, mostly because our enemy is committed to the long fight, he said. They&rsquo;re absolutely committed to the 50-, 100-year plan.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>One of my concerns is how to maintain the American will, the public will over that duration, he said. America&rsquo;s past wars lasted three to four years and sustaining support for longer wars is very difficult, he said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl y a quelque chose de fascinant dans le caract\u00e8re inalt\u00e9rable et inoxydable de ce portrait de cr\u00e9tin hurlant avec le plus grand calme. Depuis le 11 septembre 2001, les cr\u00e9tins hurlants se sont succ\u00e9d\u00e9s derri\u00e8re les m\u00eames bureaux blind\u00e9s du Pentagone, \u00e0 chaque fois comme s&rsquo;ils n&rsquo;avaient pas boug\u00e9 d&rsquo;un pouce,  car tout ce que dit Schissler, comme si rien ne s&rsquo;\u00e9tait pass\u00e9 entre temps, \u00e9tait d\u00e9j\u00e0 r\u00e9p\u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e0 sati\u00e9t\u00e9 le 11 dans l&rsquo;apr\u00e8s-midi et le 12 au matin.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl est compl\u00e8tement \u00e9trange et fascinant que Schissler et Chiarelli fassent partie de la m\u00eame arm\u00e9e, respirent le m\u00eame air, parlent la m\u00eame langue. Il est d&rsquo;ailleurs possible que, dans six mois, s&rsquo;il est balanc\u00e9 au Pentagone, Chiarelli parle le m\u00eame langage que Schissler, celui du cr\u00e9tin hurlant avec le plus grand calme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tRessentez-vous ce que nous ressentons, cet \u00e9trange malaise devant cette fa\u00e7on qu&rsquo;a ce syst\u00e8me monstrueux de modeler la psychologie des \u00eatres humains qu&rsquo;il avale et croque \u00e0 belles dents technologiquement avanc\u00e9es? Pour vous y retrouver, relisez par exemple James Carroll, qui a si bien \u00e9crit \u00e0 propos du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2923\" class=\"gen\">monstre extraordinaire<\/a> qu&rsquo;est le Pentagone  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 14 d\u00e9cembre 2006 \u00e0 12H14<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sont-ils dans la m\u00eame r\u00e9alit\u00e9? De quelle r\u00e9alit\u00e9 parlons-nous ? Qu&rsquo;est-ce que \u00e7a, la r\u00e9alit\u00e9? Apr\u00e8s le lieutenant g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Chiarelli, qui s&rsquo;\u00e9croule devant les journalistes, presque en larmes, \u00e0 son d\u00e9part d&rsquo;Irak, voici le brigadier g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Mark O. Schissler, de l&rsquo;Air Force (toujours U.S., of course). Changement complet de ton. L&rsquo;un s&rsquo;effondre, l&rsquo;autre tient droitement&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2915,6217,3706,2631,2645,6216,3194,6215,1267],"class_list":["post-68308","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-ans","tag-cent","tag-cretin","tag-de","tag-guerre","tag-hurlant","tag-pentagone","tag-shissler","tag-terrorisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68308","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68308"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68308\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68308"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68308"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68308"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}