{"id":68315,"date":"2006-12-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-12-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/17\/confirmation-tout-le-monde-attend-le-jsf-dans-son-role-de-composition-de-bill-payer\/"},"modified":"2006-12-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-12-17T00:00:00","slug":"confirmation-tout-le-monde-attend-le-jsf-dans-son-role-de-composition-de-bill-payer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/17\/confirmation-tout-le-monde-attend-le-jsf-dans-son-role-de-composition-de-bill-payer\/","title":{"rendered":"Confirmation : tout le monde attend le JSF dans son r\u00f4le de composition de \u201cbill payer<\/em>\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les premi\u00e8res indications concernant l’\u00e9volution budg\u00e9taire du Pentagone dans les circonstances tr\u00e8s nouvelles de 2007 un Congr\u00e8s compl\u00e8tement contr\u00f4l\u00e9 par les d\u00e9mocrates, un nouveau secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense confirment le peu d’estime o\u00f9 l’on tient le JSF. Defense News<\/em> a publi\u00e9 une analyse sur cette question, sur son site, le 11 d\u00e9cembre<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes grandes lignes de la nouvelle situation concernent \u00e9videmment trois grandes lignes :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t un affaiblissement du pouvoir ex\u00e9cutif central (administration, secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense et, surtout, son adjoint Gordon England charg\u00e9 de la gestion des acquisitions) ;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t un renforcement des pouvoirs des int\u00e9r\u00eats particuliers et des bureaucraties correspondantes, c’est-\u00e0-dire, notamment, des trois armes au Pentagone et de leurs relais budg\u00e9taires ;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t une volont\u00e9 du Congr\u00e8s (des d\u00e9mocrates) de poursuivre une politique d’augmentation du budget de d\u00e9fense, en suivant en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral les lignes exig\u00e9es par les militaires tout en insistant d’une fa\u00e7on th\u00e9orique sur le contr\u00f4le et la gestion des programmes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCela expose particuli\u00e8rement le JSF dans la mesure o\u00f9 c’est un programme tr\u00e8s important, d\u00e9pensier, mal contr\u00f4l\u00e9, et qui n’est d\u00e9fendu par aucune arme en particulier.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici les passages qui, dans cet article, concernent particuli\u00e8rement le JSF :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abAir Force and Navy support for the F-35 Lightning II also will continue to be watched closely. Gordon England, deputy defense secretary, recently told both services to support the project at a projected $276 billion, the most expensive acquisition program in Pentagon history but each service is known to prefer aircraft already in production: the Air Force’s F-22 Raptor and the Navy’s F\/A-18E\/F Super Hornet.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe Air Force and Navy have higher priorities than buying the F-35, <\/em>[Loren Thompson of the Lexington Institute, Arlington, Va,] said. Who knows how long Gordon will be around to tell that story?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe bottom line is that over the past two years, both the Air Force and Navy have tried to turn F-35 into a bill payer, he noted.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 17 d\u00e9cembre 2006 \u00e0 14H49<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les premi\u00e8res indications concernant l’\u00e9volution budg\u00e9taire du Pentagone dans les circonstances tr\u00e8s nouvelles de 2007 un Congr\u00e8s compl\u00e8tement contr\u00f4l\u00e9 par les d\u00e9mocrates, un nouveau secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense confirment le peu d’estime o\u00f9 l’on tient le JSF. Defense News a publi\u00e9 une analyse sur cette question, sur son site, le 11 d\u00e9cembre. Les grandes lignes… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3143,3285,4526,3318,250,3474],"class_list":["post-68315","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-air","tag-congres","tag-england","tag-force","tag-jsf","tag-thompson"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68315","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68315"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68315\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68315"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68315"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68315"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}