{"id":68324,"date":"2006-12-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-12-21T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/21\/si-hillary-avait-su\/"},"modified":"2006-12-21T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-12-21T00:00:00","slug":"si-hillary-avait-su","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/21\/si-hillary-avait-su\/","title":{"rendered":"Si Hillary avait su"},"content":{"rendered":"

Finalement, elle n’aurait pas vot\u00e9 pour les pleins pouvoirs qui donn\u00e8rent au pr\u00e9sident Bush le droit d’attaquer l’Irak. D’autres, dit-elle, auraient fait comme elle. Est-ce bien s\u00fbr? Aujourd’hui, dans tous les cas, elle le dit, sinon haut et fort du moins \u00e0 voix audible.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes explications qu’elle donne implicitement font accepter ses d\u00e9clarations comme cr\u00e9dibles . Son \u00abif we knew then what we know now<\/em>\u00bb appara\u00eet simplement comme une restriction de type si nous avions su que la guerre serait si mal faite et aboutirait \u00e0 une quasi-d\u00e9faite. La r\u00e9serve concerne l’habilet\u00e9 du metteur en sc\u00e8ne et nullement le fondement moral et politique de l’acte.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tPar cons\u00e9quent, on accordera moins d’importance \u00e0 la d\u00e9claration elle-m\u00eame, qui ne donne aucun \u00e9clairage particulier sur la politicienne sinon la confirmation de son attitude de cynisme et d’opportunisme, qu’\u00e0 la circonstance. Ces d\u00e9clarations d’Hillary sont int\u00e9ressantes en ceci qu’elles font partie du grand courant de d\u00e9sordre, de contradictions et d’incertitudes qui balaie Washington, et les d\u00e9mocrates notamment. Ceux-ci, \u00e0 l’instar d’Hillary Clinton dans ce cas, apparaissent aujourd’hui aussi embarrass\u00e9s de leur victoire qu’ils ont pu en \u00eatre satisfaits il y a quelques semaines, et \u00e0 la merci des manuvres pourtant cousues de fil blanc d’un pr\u00e9sident de pi\u00e8tres dimensions.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe I’m not going to believe this President again<\/em>, autre aspect de la d\u00e9claration de Clinton, nous la d\u00e9crit implicitement comme bien peu avis\u00e9e, si, effectivement, elle a cru en GW Bush, en ses ambitions et en ses projets.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSelon The Times<\/em> du 20 d\u00e9cembre 2006<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abHillary Clinton for the first time yesterday disavowed her vote in 2002 authorising the invasion of Iraq and said that she would announce in the new year if she would run for the presidency.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI take responsibility for that vote, Mrs Clinton told NBC. Obviously, if we knew then what we know now, there wouldn’t have been a [senate] vote and I certainly wouldn’t have voted that way.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbMrs Clinton said that she was disinclined to support an increase in troops to Iraq, even short-term. I’m not going to believe this President again, she said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 21 d\u00e9cembre 2006 \u00e0 04H18<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Finalement, elle n’aurait pas vot\u00e9 pour les pleins pouvoirs qui donn\u00e8rent au pr\u00e9sident Bush le droit d’attaquer l’Irak. D’autres, dit-elle, auraient fait comme elle. Est-ce bien s\u00fbr? Aujourd’hui, dans tous les cas, elle le dit, sinon haut et fort du moins \u00e0 voix audible. Les explications qu’elle donne implicitement font accepter ses d\u00e9clarations comme cr\u00e9dibles… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[934,3198,3278,857,6097],"class_list":["post-68324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-clinton","tag-gw","tag-hillary","tag-irak","tag-vote"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68324"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68324\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}