{"id":68325,"date":"2006-12-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-12-21T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/21\/la-grotesque-relationships-gw-blair-debattue-comme-un-cas-de-lavage-regulier-du-cerveau-de-la-marionnette\/"},"modified":"2006-12-21T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-12-21T00:00:00","slug":"la-grotesque-relationships-gw-blair-debattue-comme-un-cas-de-lavage-regulier-du-cerveau-de-la-marionnette","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/21\/la-grotesque-relationships-gw-blair-debattue-comme-un-cas-de-lavage-regulier-du-cerveau-de-la-marionnette\/","title":{"rendered":"La \u201cgrotesque relationships<\/em>\u201d GW-Blair d\u00e9battue comme un cas de lavage r\u00e9gulier du cerveau de la marionnette"},"content":{"rendered":"

D\u00e9sormais, les relations entre Blair et son ami \u00e0 la Maison-Blanche sont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement comme une sorte de cas-clinique de lavage r\u00e9gulier du cerveau du Britannique par l’Am\u00e9ricain. C’est le cas avec le titre de The Independent<\/em> de ce matin<\/a>. Blair y est d\u00e9crit comme r\u00e9duit \u00e0 tenter de prouver qu’il a de l’influence, sans le moindre succ\u00e8s \u00e9videmment puisque r\u00e9duit \u00e9galement \u00e0 un cerveau revu en permanence par GW Bush, per\u00e7u en la circonstance comme une sorte de Faust d’occasion : \u00abBrainwashed’ Blair losing battle to prove his influence<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBlair revient \u00e9videmment (bis<\/em>) bredouille de son voyage au Moyen-Orient. Lequel voyage a d’ailleurs \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9duit \u00e0 n\u00e9ant d\u00e8s le d\u00e9part par l’habituel coup de couteau dans le dos de GW : \u00abAs Tony Blair doggedly toured Israel and the Palestinian Authority yesterday, it was said that his efforts had been undermined by events in Washington. Informed sources there suggested that George W. Bush was poised to reject the key recommendations of the Iraq Study Group, increasing rather than decreasing US troop numbers in Iraq and declining to make the revival of the Israeli-Palestinian peace process the centrepiece of his broader regional strategy.<\/em>\u00bb (Selon The Times<\/em> du 19 d\u00e9cembre<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tA son retour \u00e0 Londres, Blair est attendu par des paroles peu am\u00e8nes. On ne prend plus de gants. M\u00eame un vice-pr\u00e9sident irakien, pourtant autre marionnette lui-m\u00eame on dirait par fonction, se permet des d\u00e9clarations publiques qui, si elles sont bien intentionn\u00e9es, apparaissent comme assez m\u00e9prisantes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe Prime Minister returned yesterday from his seven-nation visit to the Middle East, apparently without achieving any significant breakthrough in the peace process. But British officials said that he had found a desire to make progress among Israeli and Palestinian leaders, and insisted that he had never expected to find a magic solution. They said his tour should be judged over the longer term rather than immediately.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe trip has been overshadowed by a growing perception that Mr Blair’s relationship with President Bush is very much a one-way street in which Britain gets very little in return for his unwavering public backing for Washington. Even some Blairites are starting to question the Prime Minister’s stance. They are appalled that President Bush has refused to honour his 2004 promise to expend capital on the Middle East peace process during his second term. He doesn’t cut Tony much slack, one Blair aide said yesterday.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbFor someone who is often described as a lucky politician, cabinet ministers believe that Mr Blair was extremely unlucky to have President Bush in the White House for the past six years.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbTareq al-Hashemi, the Iraqi Vice-President, claimed that Mr Blair was ready about three months ago to back a timetable for withdrawing allied forces from Iraq, but was brainwashed into changing his mind during his recent talks with President Bush in Washington. He told the Council on Foreign Relations in New York: It is quite unfortunate that your President made a sort of blackmail out of Mr Blair.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbLater he told the BBC: I got the impression that he was much willing, and interested in fact, to raise this subject maybe for the first time with Mr Bush.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI think he discovered that Mr Bush is still adamant that he’s not going to declare some sort of timetable for withdrawal to avoid passing wrong messages to terrorism.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 21 d\u00e9cembre 2006 \u00e0 05H04<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

D\u00e9sormais, les relations entre Blair et son ami \u00e0 la Maison-Blanche sont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement comme une sorte de cas-clinique de lavage r\u00e9gulier du cerveau du Britannique par l’Am\u00e9ricain. C’est le cas avec le titre de The Independent de ce matin. Blair y est d\u00e9crit comme r\u00e9duit \u00e0 tenter de prouver qu’il a de l’influence, sans… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[705,6241,2631,6242,3198,3090,6240,4576,3345],"class_list":["post-68325","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-blair","tag-cerveau","tag-de","tag-grotesque","tag-gw","tag-influence","tag-lavage","tag-marionnette","tag-relationships"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68325","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68325"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68325\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}