{"id":68334,"date":"2006-12-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-12-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/23\/yamamah-la-city-napprecie-pas-vraiment\/"},"modified":"2006-12-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-12-23T00:00:00","slug":"yamamah-la-city-napprecie-pas-vraiment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/23\/yamamah-la-city-napprecie-pas-vraiment\/","title":{"rendered":"Yamamah<\/em>? La City<\/em> n’appr\u00e9cie pas vraiment"},"content":{"rendered":"

En un sens, le monde financier n’a pas beaucoup de go\u00fbt pour les arguments de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale et autres babioles \u00e0-la-Blair. On parle de ce qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 avanc\u00e9 pour justifier l’abandon<\/a> de l’enqu\u00eate du SFO sur la corruption dans le cadre des contrats Yamamah<\/em> avec l’Arabie. La City<\/em> rechigne diablement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe Financial Times<\/em> signale, dans ses \u00e9ditions d’aujourd’hui<\/a>, une deuxi\u00e8me protestation d’un groupe financier fameux apr\u00e8s la d\u00e9cision suscit\u00e9e par le Premier ministre Tony Blair d’abandonner l’enqu\u00eate du SFO dans l’affaire Yamamah<\/em>. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abMark Anson, chief executive of Hermes <\/em>[the UK’s biggest pension fund], which manages the BT Pension Scheme, on Friday wrote to Tony Blair, the British prime minister, saying the decision <\/em>[to halt the Serious Fraud Office’s inquiry into Saudi arms deals] had threatened the UK’s reputation as a leading financial centre and would have a high long-term cost for business and markets.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbHermes is the second big institutional investor this week to write to the government about concerns that halting the probe risked undermining the integrity of London’s capital markets.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl ne faut pas s’y tromper : ces protestations ne sont pas de pure forme. Quand la City<\/em> n’a rien \u00e0 redire \u00e0 une d\u00e9cision du gouvernement, elle le f\u00e9licite discr\u00e8tement ou elle se tait si la chose est d\u00e9licate. Si la City<\/em> proteste, si elle se signale \u00e0 si haute voix, c’est qu’elle n’est pas contente. (On a d’ailleurs pu mesurer la mauvaise humeur du monde financier britannique aux commentaires extr\u00eamement durs du Financial Times<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa r\u00e9putation est une chose qui compte sur la place de Londres, et afficher aussi ind\u00fbment que l’a fait le couple Blair-BAE la volont\u00e9 de corrompre et le m\u00e9pris de la loi est quelque chose qui a bien du mal \u00e0 passer. Plus encore, la perspective que le Royaume-Uni soit soumis \u00e0 une action de l’OCDE<\/a> t\u00e9tanise les banquiers de la City<\/em>. Si l’affaire Yamamah<\/em> se poursuit devant les tribunaux, Tony Blair se sentira bien seul.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 23 d\u00e9cembre 2006 \u00e0 13H11<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

En un sens, le monde financier n’a pas beaucoup de go\u00fbt pour les arguments de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale et autres babioles \u00e0-la-Blair. On parle de ce qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 avanc\u00e9 pour justifier l’abandon de l’enqu\u00eate du SFO sur la corruption dans le cadre des contrats Yamamah avec l’Arabie. La City rechigne diablement. Le Financial Times signale,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[705,5513,3858,2851,3367,2852,5045,4364],"class_list":["post-68334","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-blair","tag-city","tag-corruption","tag-financial","tag-ocde","tag-times","tag-vertu","tag-yamamah"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68334","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68334"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68334\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68334"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68334"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68334"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}