{"id":68338,"date":"2006-12-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-12-25T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/25\/gates-et-liran-une-analyse-alarmiste\/"},"modified":"2006-12-25T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-12-25T00:00:00","slug":"gates-et-liran-une-analyse-alarmiste","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/25\/gates-et-liran-une-analyse-alarmiste\/","title":{"rendered":"Gates et l&rsquo;Iran : une analyse alarmiste"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Une id\u00e9e en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral admise, en m\u00eame temps que le plan Baker de l&rsquo;ISG avait fait son apparition sur la sc\u00e8ne washingtonienne, \u00e9tait que le nouveau secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense Robert Gates serait un mod\u00e9r\u00e9, qui exercerait une influence mod\u00e9ratrice sur l&rsquo;administration GW. Une r\u00e9cente (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.rawstory.com\/printstory.php?story=4128\" class=\"gen\">22 d\u00e9cembre<\/a>) analyse de <em>RAW Story<\/em> offre une vision inverse.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;analyse cite un ancien officiel de haut niveau de la CIA, affirmant que Gates a \u00e9t\u00e9 brief\u00e9 par l&rsquo;\u00e9quipe du vice-pr\u00e9sident Cheney, et non par le Pentagone, avant son audition au S\u00e9nat pour sa confirmation. C&rsquo;est une indication selon laquelle Gates serait directement contr\u00f4l\u00e9 par l&rsquo;aile la plus extr\u00e9miste de l&rsquo;administration. (\u00ab[A]<em>ccording to a former high ranking CIA official close to the key players, Gates was prepped for his Senate confirmation hearings by high level Cheney staffers, including David Addington, Chief of Staff to the Vice President, and David Wurmser, Cheney&rsquo;s Middle East advisor. Cheney&rsquo;s office prepped Gates for the hearings, this official claims. His guys Wurmser and Addington got <\/em>[Gates] <em>ready, not the Pentagon.<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe point principal sur lequel porte l&rsquo;analyse est l&rsquo;Iran, avec la suggestion que Gates serait beaucoup moins oppos\u00e9 \u00e0 l&rsquo;attaque qu&rsquo;il ne para\u00eet l&rsquo;\u00eatre, dans tous les cas selon d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3504\" class=\"gen\">autres interpr\u00e9tations<\/a>. D&rsquo;autres indications sont donn\u00e9es dans le cadre de cette analyse pour achever de peindre une situation tr\u00e8s inqui\u00e9tante pour ce qui concerne la possibilit\u00e9 d&rsquo;une attaque contre l&rsquo;Iran.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>In a recent appearance in Baghdad, Gates made remarks that are discouraging to some military and intelligence officials. We need to make damned sure, said Gates, that the neighbors understand that we&rsquo;re going to be here for a long time  here being the Persian Gulf.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>According to intelligence officials and foreign policy experts who spoke on the topic off-record, these views, and a possible expansion of a US military presence in the Gulf region, are of great concern to many experts who had hoped that Gates would be more pragmatic about US options toward Iran.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>News reports Tuesday confirming the deployment plans for a second gulf carrier make more clear than ever that the US buildup in the Gulf is in direct response to perceived threats from Iran.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Trita Parsi, a Middle East expert at Johns Hopkins University who studied under former Neo-conservative philosopher and economist Francis Fukuyama, says that he finds these developments very concerning. Parsi says that he is particularly concerned by the placement of ships in the region as a deterrent, coupled with the already increased activity from the Gulf Corporation Council (GCC) countries.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>It is coinciding with increased arms sales to the GCC states, as well as efforts by some of these GCC states to get the US to take sides in the Iraqi civil war, Parsi told RAW STORY. If Washington chooses to do so, the risk for a regional war will be considerable. The Bush Administration&rsquo;s allergy towards talking to Iran is increasing tensions in the region by the minute at a time when things already are too explosive.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Another CIA official reiterates what has been already reported here and in and other publications for the past year, that Cheney has promised that Iran will be taken care of by spring<\/em> [of 2007].\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 25 d\u00e9cembre 2006 \u00e0 13H54<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Une id\u00e9e en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral admise, en m\u00eame temps que le plan Baker de l&rsquo;ISG avait fait son apparition sur la sc\u00e8ne washingtonienne, \u00e9tait que le nouveau secr\u00e9taire \u00e0 la d\u00e9fense Robert Gates serait un mod\u00e9r\u00e9, qui exercerait une influence mod\u00e9ratrice sur l&rsquo;administration GW. Une r\u00e9cente (22 d\u00e9cembre) analyse de RAW Story offre une vision inverse.&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6262,1294,3984,2773,5331,5332],"class_list":["post-68338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-alarmiste","tag-cheney","tag-gates","tag-iran","tag-raw","tag-story"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68338"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68338\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}