{"id":68348,"date":"2006-12-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-12-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/29\/pour-completer-notre-grande-crise\/"},"modified":"2006-12-29T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-12-29T00:00:00","slug":"pour-completer-notre-grande-crise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/12\/29\/pour-completer-notre-grande-crise\/","title":{"rendered":"Pour compl\u00e9ter notre \u201cGrande Crise\u201d\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

Pour compl\u00e9ter notre \u00ab\u00a0Grande Crise\u00a0\u00bb…<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

En raison de l’importance que nous attribuons \u00e0 un signe tel que la publication du texte d’Anatol Lieven, dont nous rendons compte dans notre \u00ab\u00a0F&C \u00ab\u00a0<\/a> d’aujourd’hui, nous compl\u00e9tons notre commentaire par quelques indications de r\u00e9f\u00e9rences disponibles sur notre site, en plus de celles qui sont indiqu\u00e9es directement, dans la logique du propos.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

• On se r\u00e9f\u00e8rera au texte «Thinking the Unthinkable<\/em>», texte d’une Analyse<\/em> extraite de notre Lettre d’Analyse (papier) dd&e<\/em>, mis en ligne le 26 f\u00e9vrier 2004<\/a>. Nous y d\u00e9veloppions certains \u00e9l\u00e9ments de r\u00e9flexion, notamment la mise en cause de la modernit\u00e9 scientifique, \u00e0 l’\u00e9clairage de la crise climatique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

• Pour compl\u00e9ter le texte pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent, il y a \u00e9galement notre texte plus ancien (sur la «civilisation-imposture<\/em>»), du 27 juillet 2002<\/a>, \u00e9galement extrait de dd&e<\/em>, sur les th\u00e8se de l’historien britannique Toynbee. Il s’agit notamment de son approche esquiss\u00e9e du blocage auquel conduit le d\u00e9veloppement de l’hyper-puissance technologique de notre civilisation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

• Enfin, pour mettre en \u00e9vidence l’extraordinaire blocage psychologique dont nous avons fait montre face \u00e0 cette crise climatique, on se r\u00e9f\u00e8rera \u00e9galement \u00e0 une interview donn\u00e9e, il y a vingt-neuf ans, \u00e0 l’hebdomadaire U.S. News & World Report<\/em> du 3 mars 1975, par l’anthropologue am\u00e9ricain Loren Corey Eiseley<\/a>, texte \u00e9galement repris sur ce site<\/a>. (Eiseley mourut le 9 juillet 1977.) Cette simple citation ci-dessous mesure a substance de l’avertissement de Eiseley.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

Question —<\/em><\/strong> Professor Eiseley, what is science and technology going to do for people in years ahead?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Answer —<\/em><\/strong> I think science, more and more, is going to be giving its attention to finding ways whereby humanity can live at peace with itself and nature.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

If the human race is to survive into the next century, scientific technology will have to learn how to control the devastating forces it has unwittingly turned loose on the planet — the world’s exploding population, the reckless pollution of the environment, the spiraling arms race and the expenditure of irreplaceable energy. All of these disasters are rooted in the successes of our scientific technology of the past — from things like medical advances, sanitary engineering, atomic energy and the gasoline-combustion engine.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

This is the great paradox of the scientific age.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 29 d\u00e9cembre 2006 \u00e0 10H14<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pour compl\u00e9ter notre \u00ab\u00a0Grande Crise\u00a0\u00bb… En raison de l’importance que nous attribuons \u00e0 un signe tel que la publication du texte d’Anatol Lieven, dont nous rendons compte dans notre \u00ab\u00a0F&C \u00ab\u00a0 d’aujourd’hui, nous compl\u00e9tons notre commentaire par quelques indications de r\u00e9f\u00e9rences disponibles sur notre site, en plus de celles qui sont indiqu\u00e9es directement, dans la… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3392,3228,4269,2655,3072],"class_list":["post-68348","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-climatique","tag-crise","tag-eiseley","tag-modernite","tag-toynbee"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68348","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68348"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68348\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68348"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68348"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68348"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}