{"id":68357,"date":"2007-01-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-01-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/01\/pour-lancien-officier-de-la-cia-michael-sheuer-les-usa-et-lotan-vont-perdre-en-afghanistan\/"},"modified":"2007-01-01T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-01-01T00:00:00","slug":"pour-lancien-officier-de-la-cia-michael-sheuer-les-usa-et-lotan-vont-perdre-en-afghanistan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/01\/pour-lancien-officier-de-la-cia-michael-sheuer-les-usa-et-lotan-vont-perdre-en-afghanistan\/","title":{"rendered":"Pour l’ancien officier de la CIA Michael Sheuer, les USA et l’OTAN vont perdre en Afghanistan"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tout le monde n’est donc pas de l’avis du scintillant g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Karl Eikenberry. Le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral nous annonce in fine<\/em> une victoire finale<\/a> en Afghanistan, tandis que Michael Sheuer, ancien officier de la CIA, nous annonce le contraire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSheuer n’\u00e9tant plus \u00e0 la CIA, on dira officiellement qu’il parle sans savoir et pouss\u00e9 par la rancur. Nous dirions qu’il parle lib\u00e9r\u00e9 des contraintes du syst\u00e8me. Sheuer est d\u00e9j\u00e0 connu pour des critiques s\u00e9rieuses des m\u00e9thodes de la CIA et il a publi\u00e9, en anonyme au moment de la publication, un livre important sur la critique de la politique imp\u00e9rialiste US (Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror<\/em>, 2004, par Anonymous.) Sheuer a \u00e9t\u00e9 en service dans la zone du Moyen-Orient et du sous-contineznt indien et a particip\u00e9 \u00e0 diff\u00e9rentes op\u00e9rations contre Ben Laden pendant dix ans.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDans le Los Angeles Times, il \u00e9crivit le 5 d\u00e9cembre 2005<\/a> : \u00abI do not profess a broad expertise in international affairs, but between January 1996 and June 1999 I was in charge of running operations against Al Qaeda from Washington. When it comes to this small slice of the large U.S. national security pie, I speak with firsthand experience (and for several score of CIA officers) when I state categorically that during this time senior White House officials repeatedly refused to act on sound intelligence that provided multiple chances to eliminate Osama bin Laden either by capture or by U.S. military attack. I witnessed and documented, along with dozens of other CIA officers, instances where life-risking intelligence-gathering work of the agency’s men and women in the field was wasted.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAujourd’hui, Sheuer nous parle donc de l’Afghanistan, selon des d\u00e9clarations rapport\u00e9es par le site indien ZeeNews.com<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abA former senior CIA operative who tracked Osama bin Laden for 10 long years foresees an apparent American defeat in Afghanistan.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbMichael Sheuer said the way ahead in Afghanistan and along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border ultimately would lead to the defeat of US and NATO forces and the demise of the Karzai government.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbScheuer told the Daily Times in Washington that by failing to accomplish the only mission that had to be accomplished in Afghanistan, the US was now faced with a growing insurgency that probably already outnumbered the combined US-NATO forces.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tFaites votre choix, entre le brillant g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Karl Eikenberry qui rentre au Pentagone et Michael Sheuer qui a quitt\u00e9 la CIA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 1er janvier 2007 \u00e0 10H05<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tout le monde n’est donc pas de l’avis du scintillant g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Karl Eikenberry. Le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral nous annonce in fine une victoire finale en Afghanistan, tandis que Michael Sheuer, ancien officier de la CIA, nous annonce le contraire. Sheuer n’\u00e9tant plus \u00e0 la CIA, on dira officiellement qu’il parle sans savoir et pouss\u00e9 par la rancur.… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3236,3265,3104,4255,3266,6283,6282],"class_list":["post-68357","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-afghanistan","tag-ben","tag-cia","tag-defaite","tag-laden","tag-ptan","tag-sheuer"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68357","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68357"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68357\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68357"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68357"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68357"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}