{"id":68360,"date":"2007-01-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-01-02T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/02\/la-riposte-du-congres-si-gw-continue-a-jouer-perso-la-paralysie-de-la-paralysie\/"},"modified":"2007-01-02T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-01-02T00:00:00","slug":"la-riposte-du-congres-si-gw-continue-a-jouer-perso-la-paralysie-de-la-paralysie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/02\/la-riposte-du-congres-si-gw-continue-a-jouer-perso-la-paralysie-de-la-paralysie\/","title":{"rendered":"La riposte du Congr\u00e8s si GW continue \u00e0 jouer \u201cperso\u201d : la paralysie de la paralysie"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Une autre appr\u00e9ciation sur la situation \u00e0 Washington, \u00e0 pr\u00e9voir pour 2007, pour confirmer sans doute l&rsquo;avis d\u00e9sabus\u00e9 de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3533\" class=\"gen\">David Corn<\/a> Celle du s\u00e9nateur (r\u00e9publicain) Richard Lugar, qui termine sa carri\u00e8re parlementaire en laissant le poste de pr\u00e9sident de la puissante Commission des Relations Ext\u00e9rieures \u00e0 un d\u00e9mocrate.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAu cours d&rsquo;une \u00e9mission de la cha\u00eene <em>Fox News<\/em>, Lugar a \u00e9t\u00e9 convi\u00e9 \u00e0 donner son avis sur la situation des rapports entre le pr\u00e9sident et le Congr\u00e8s (\u00e0 majorit\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate) en 2007. Manifestement, Lugar a voulu donner un conseil \u00e0 la Maison-Blanche, sous forme d&rsquo;avertissement amical nourri sans aucun doute aux confidences des parlementaires d\u00e9mocrates sur leurs intentions en 2007. Lugar conseille au pr\u00e9sident de donner au Congr\u00e8s ce qu&rsquo;il veut, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire au moins l&rsquo;apparence de compter en \u00e9tant au moins consult\u00e9, \u00e9cout\u00e9, etc. Ce conseil appara\u00eet finalement \u00e9tonnant et int\u00e9ressant dans la bouche d&rsquo;un homme qui occupait une place \u00e9minente au S\u00e9nat, puisqu&rsquo;il revient au constat que l&rsquo;administration Bush s&rsquo;est moqu\u00e9 constamment du Congr\u00e8s pendant tout le temps o\u00f9 lui-m\u00eame, Lugar, y si\u00e8geait. (\u00ab<em>In the past the administration has been inclined, not to disregard Congress, but not to take Congress very seriously. I think this time Congress has to be taken seriously, there&rsquo;s been an election, Republicans lost the election.<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEt que se passera-t-il si l&rsquo;administration Bush ne suit pas les conseils de Lugar ? interroge (le <a href=\"http:\/\/rawstory.com\/showarticle.php?src=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffingtonpost.com%2F2006%2F12%2F31%2Fgop-sen-lugar-if-bush-d_n_37503.html\" class=\"gen\">31 d\u00e9cembre 2006<\/a>) l&rsquo;intervieweur Chris Wallace.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<strong><em>WALLACE:<\/em><\/strong> <em>And what if he doesn&rsquo;t? What if basically, you know, he calls a group of you in, has the meeting around the cabinet room&#8230;<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<strong><em>LUGAR:<\/em><\/strong> <em>Which is the usually course.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<strong><em>WALLACE:<\/em><\/strong> <em>Yeah, then what?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<strong><em>LUGAR:<\/em><\/strong> <em>Then he can anticipate, not endless hearings, but a lot of hearings, a lot of study, a lot of criticism. In other words, as opposed to having a Foreign Relations Committee that really now is well-informed, understands, may not agree, but understands how you get from place to place, we have an assortment of invitations, demands for subpoenas, all sorts of situations in which Administration figures perhaps reluctantly come to the committee, or don&rsquo;t come to the committee, or various other experts discuss..<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<strong><em>WALLACE:<\/em><\/strong> <em>You&rsquo;re saying this could get ugly.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<strong><em>LUGAR:<\/em><\/strong> <em>Yes, it could. And it need not.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLugar nous laisse comprendre qu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;y aura pas d&rsquo;opposition frontale du Congr\u00e8s d\u00e9mocrate \u00e0 la politique du pr\u00e9sident, mais une tactique de harc\u00e8lement bureaucratique, une tactique de retardement, d&rsquo;accumulation d&rsquo;obstacles proc\u00e9duriers, d&rsquo;auditions intempestives et spectaculaires, d&rsquo;enqu\u00eates, de rapports, etc Le Congr\u00e8s ajoutera son action paralysante \u00e0 la paralysie d&rsquo;ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9vidente de l&rsquo;administration GW Bush. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 2 janvier 2007 \u00e0 01H59<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Une autre appr\u00e9ciation sur la situation \u00e0 Washington, \u00e0 pr\u00e9voir pour 2007, pour confirmer sans doute l&rsquo;avis d\u00e9sabus\u00e9 de David Corn Celle du s\u00e9nateur (r\u00e9publicain) Richard Lugar, qui termine sa carri\u00e8re parlementaire en laissant le poste de pr\u00e9sident de la puissante Commission des Relations Ext\u00e9rieures \u00e0 un d\u00e9mocrate. Au cours d&rsquo;une \u00e9mission de la cha\u00eene&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[868,3285,3009,3288,4000,4608],"class_list":["post-68360","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bush","tag-congres","tag-democrates","tag-fox","tag-lugar","tag-paralysie"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68360","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68360"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68360\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68360"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68360"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68360"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}