Sunday Times<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLa chose est pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e d’une fa\u00e7on tr\u00e8s d\u00e9taill\u00e9e, qui est particuli\u00e8rement remarquable pour une r\u00e9v\u00e9lation de cette sorte.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00abTwo Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear bunker-busters, according to several Israeli military sources.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe attack would be the first with nuclear weapons since 1945, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Israeli weapons would each have a force equivalent to one-fifteenth of the Hiroshima bomb.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbUnder the plans, conventional laser-guided bombs would open tunnels into the targets. Mini-nukes would then immediately be fired into a plant at Natanz, exploding deep underground to reduce the risk of radioactive fallout.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAs soon as the green light is given, it will be one mission, one strike and the Iranian nuclear project will be demolished, said one of the sources.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe plans, disclosed to The Sunday Times last week, have been prompted in part by the Israeli intelligence service Mossad’s assessment that Iran is on the verge of producing enough enriched uranium to make nuclear weapons within two years.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIsraeli military commanders believe conventional strikes may no longer be enough to annihilate increasingly well-defended enrichment facilities. Several have been built beneath at least 70ft of concrete and rock. However, the nuclear-tipped bunker-busters would be used only if a conventional attack was ruled out and if the United States declined to intervene, senior sources said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tPar ailleurs, le texte ne fait pas myst\u00e8re de la possibilit\u00e9 que cette fuite ait \u00e9t\u00e9 volontaire, pour \u00e9ventuellement plusieurs effets esp\u00e9r\u00e9s : \u00abMilitary analysts said the disclosure of the plans could be intended to put pressure on Tehran to halt enrichment, cajole America into action or soften up world opinion in advance of an Israeli attack.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tSuivent de nombreuses autres r\u00e9serves quant \u00e0 la possibilit\u00e9 que cette attaque ait r\u00e9ellement lieu, explicitement d\u00e9velopp\u00e9es dans l’article, ce qui en r\u00e9duit d’autant l’impact. En technique journalistique, on ferait l’hypoth\u00e8se que cette fuite a \u00e9t\u00e9 organis\u00e9e par des autorit\u00e9s officielles, \u00e0 condition que ces r\u00e9serves soient mentionn\u00e9es. On doit donc admettre que la nouvelle fait, pour l’instant, plus partie de la guerre de l’information autour de la crise iranienne que de projets de guerre r\u00e9els.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 7 janvier 2007 \u00e0 08H22<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Cela fait bien pr\u00e8s de deux ans qu’on sp\u00e9cule quasi ouvertement (presque officiellement) sur la possibilit\u00e9 d’une attaque a\u00e9rienne isra\u00e9lienne contre les installations nucl\u00e9aires de l’Iran. Mais on n’avait jamais \u00e9voqu\u00e9 jusqu’ici la possibilit\u00e9 que cette attaque f\u00fbt nucl\u00e9aire. C’est fait, avec un article, ce matin, dans le Sunday Times. La chose est pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e d’une… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2870,2773,2774,3004],"class_list":["post-68381","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-attaque","tag-iran","tag-israel","tag-nucleaire"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68381","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68381\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68381"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68381"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}