L’un des dossiers les plus difficiles \u00e0 d\u00e9finir est celui des relations isra\u00e9lo-am\u00e9ricanistes. On ne cachera pas que c’est une surprise tant une des visions de ces relations est de leur accorder une pr\u00e9pond\u00e9rance absolue, notamment pour ce qui est d’un alignement USA-Isra\u00ebl qui est, pour beaucoup, un alignement des USA sur Isra\u00ebl. Certains Isra\u00e9liens et certains milieux en Isra\u00ebl ont une tout autre vision de la question.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tVoici celle du centre des National Security Studies, anciennement le Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, une source tr\u00e8s r\u00e9put\u00e9e s’il en est et d’autre part des d\u00e9clarations d’un des chercheurs qui y travaillent. Le site WorldTribune.com<\/em> rapporte des pr\u00e9cisions dans un texte mis en ligne le 5 janvier<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abThe Institute for National Security Studies, formerly the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies, said the Lebanon war eroded Israeli deterrence among Arabs and others in the Middle East, Middle East Newsline reported.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe institute, in one of the most scathing reports published in decades, said the war exposed Israel’s weaknesses and placed the Jewish state in a worse strategic position.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe war in Lebanon underscored the problematic and fluctuating nature of Israel’s strategic environment, damaged Israel’s deterrent image, and exposed weaknesses in the Israel Defense Forces and the decision-making process in Israel, the institute said in a report released on Tuesday. <\/em>[…] Israel’s strategic environment of 2006 is problematic, the institute said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLes chercheurs de l’institut, semble sugg\u00e9rer la d\u00e9p\u00eache, se sont montr\u00e9s volontairement tr\u00e8s discrets. Sauf un, Giora Eiland, un major g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de r\u00e9serve qui \u00e9tait \u00e0 la t\u00eate du Conseil National de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 isra\u00e9lien jusqu’\u00e0 la mi-2006. Son \u00e9valuation, particuli\u00e8rement pessimiste, concerne la profonde d\u00e9ception qui affecte l’administration GW Bush \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard d’Isra\u00ebl, depuis la guerre contre le Hezbollah. La chose ne doit pas compl\u00e8tement nous \u00e9tonner<\/a> ; ce qui doit nous arr\u00eater, par contre, c’est l’ampleur du sentiment de d\u00e9ception que d\u00e9crit Eiland et, semble-t-il, les cons\u00e9quences au niveau d’ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 fonctionnel voire op\u00e9rationnel.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab[Eiland] said he doubted whether the White House, out of fear that the operation would fail, would approve Israeli air strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThere is a harsh disappointment of us in the United States, Eiland said. We didn’t supply the goods. It embarrassed our friends in the United States, our friends in Congress. It has long-range repercussions.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t(…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbEiland said Israel’s military doctrine based on the expectation that air power could defeat an enemy failed in Lebanon. He called for a review of Israel’s military tactics and concepts, saying this was more important than arms procurement.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe Israeli military made mistakes in doctrine and the question is whether this will change, Eiland said. I am not sure.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 8 janvier 2007 \u00e0 17H22<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" L’un des dossiers les plus difficiles \u00e0 d\u00e9finir est celui des relations isra\u00e9lo-am\u00e9ricanistes. On ne cachera pas que c’est une surprise tant une des visions de ces relations est de leur accorder une pr\u00e9pond\u00e9rance absolue, notamment pour ce qui est d’un alignement USA-Isra\u00ebl qui est, pour beaucoup, un alignement des USA sur Isra\u00ebl. Certains Isra\u00e9liens… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5502,6311,6309,2773,2774,6310,2804],"class_list":["post-68388","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-center","tag-deception","tag-eiland","tag-iran","tag-israel","tag-jaffee","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68388","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68388"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68388\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}