{"id":68395,"date":"2007-01-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-01-10T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/10\/finalement-non-blair-est-daccord-oui-il-faut-se-battre-contre-le-rechauffement-climatique\/"},"modified":"2007-01-10T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-01-10T00:00:00","slug":"finalement-non-blair-est-daccord-oui-il-faut-se-battre-contre-le-rechauffement-climatique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/10\/finalement-non-blair-est-daccord-oui-il-faut-se-battre-contre-le-rechauffement-climatique\/","title":{"rendered":"Finalement, non, Blair est d&rsquo;accord : oui, il faut se battre contre le r\u00e9chauffement climatique"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>En 24 heures, Tony Blair a donc chang\u00e9 d&rsquo;avis. Ses interventions concernant la lutte contre le r\u00e9chauffement climatique, dont il \u00e9tait conduit \u00e0 juger qu&rsquo;elle est <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3572\" class=\"gen\">inutile<\/a> finalement, ont soulev\u00e9 beaucoup d&rsquo;\u00e9motions et nourri nombre de critiques. Du coup, le Premier ministre a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 une position diff\u00e9rente, d&rsquo;abord sur la question de ses propres voyages. <a href=\"http:\/\/environment.guardian.co.uk\/climatechange\/story\/0,,1986688,00.html\" class=\"gen\">Selon<\/a> le <em>Guardian<\/em>, qui a lanc\u00e9 la pol\u00e9mique lundi matin : \u00ab<em>Tony Blair tried last night to restore his green credentials by announcing that he would offset carbon emissions from his and his family&rsquo;s holiday travel. Downing Street made the concession after the two lobby briefings yesterday were dominated by Mr Blair&rsquo;s insistence that he had no intention of cutting back on personal flights.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tBien s\u00fbr, il \u00e9tait question des voyages personnels de Blair (ne voyage-t-il pas trop pour quelqu&rsquo;un qui pr\u00e9tend lutter contre les \u00e9missions de CO2?) mais aussi de la question des r\u00e9glementations \u00e9ventuelles des activit\u00e9s des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s de transport a\u00e9rien. Enfin, Blair avait avanc\u00e9 quelques jugements abrupts et fondamentaux sur l&rsquo;int\u00e9r\u00eat ou pas de r\u00e9duire les \u00e9missions de CO2, sur l&rsquo;avantage de s&rsquo;en remettre \u00e0 la science pour r\u00e9soudre la crise, etc.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa principale attaque contre Blair est venue d&rsquo;une <a href=\"http:\/\/news.independent.co.uk\/environment\/article2140266.ece\" class=\"gen\">personnalit\u00e9 officielle<\/a> importante : \u00ab<em>The Prime Minister provoked a backlash led by Sir Jonathon Porritt, chairman of the Government&rsquo;s Sustainable Development Commission, who said Mr Blair&rsquo;s leadership on the issue in Britain had been patchy and muddle-headed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t(&#8230;)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Sir Jonathon acknowledged that Mr Blair had done more than any other world leader to raise awareness about climate change but said there was a complete failure to show leadership on the issue in Britain.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>He told BBC Radio 4 it was completely wrong for the Prime Minister to suggest scientists could be relied on to find a painless solution to global warming and to think that voters were unwilling to change their own behaviour.I am not saying Mr Blair should never take another foreign holiday, but I am saying that he should be looking carefully at the impacts of those holidays, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Sir Jonathon accused Mr Blair of having a policy of complete fatalistic despair by arguing that Britain accounted for only 2 per cent of global carbon emissions. If we are going to advise and influence other countries to reduce emissions, we have got to take the lead ourselves  in our own lives and as a nation through the economy, he said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;\u00e9pisode peut para\u00eetre futile ou accessoire mais il est surtout exemplaire. Il montre que la crise climatique est d\u00e9sormais un probl\u00e8me d&rsquo;une dimension fondamentale pour la vie publique,  au Royaume-Uni dans ce cas, mais il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;un pays essentiel pour l&rsquo;influence; il montre \u00e9galement qu&rsquo;on ne peut plus \u00e9carter la question de la lutte contre le r\u00e9chauffement climatique ou prendre cette question comme accessoire. Les r\u00e9actions de la machine politico-m\u00e9diatique ne permettent plus une telle attitude. Et Blair, qui vit sans grandeur ses derniers mois de Premier ministre, s&rsquo;aligne comme si Bush lui avait parl\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 10 janvier 2007 \u00e0 09H25<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>En 24 heures, Tony Blair a donc chang\u00e9 d&rsquo;avis. Ses interventions concernant la lutte contre le r\u00e9chauffement climatique, dont il \u00e9tait conduit \u00e0 juger qu&rsquo;elle est inutile finalement, ont soulev\u00e9 beaucoup d&rsquo;\u00e9motions et nourri nombre de critiques. Du coup, le Premier ministre a pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 une position diff\u00e9rente, d&rsquo;abord sur la question de ses propres voyages.&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3143,705,3392,3228,4310,4126],"class_list":["post-68395","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-air","tag-blair","tag-climatique","tag-crise","tag-progres","tag-ryan"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68395","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68395"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68395\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68395"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68395"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68395"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}