{"id":68400,"date":"2007-01-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-01-12T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/12\/arriveront-ils-meme-a-se-mettre-a-dos-egalement-les-kurdes-dirak-ils-y-travaillent\/"},"modified":"2007-01-12T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-01-12T00:00:00","slug":"arriveront-ils-meme-a-se-mettre-a-dos-egalement-les-kurdes-dirak-ils-y-travaillent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/12\/arriveront-ils-meme-a-se-mettre-a-dos-egalement-les-kurdes-dirak-ils-y-travaillent\/","title":{"rendered":"Arriveront-ils m\u00eame \u00e0 se mettre \u00e0 dos \u00e9galement les Kurdes d’Irak? Ils y travaillent"},"content":{"rendered":"

Il y a quelque chose d’\u00e9trange dans l’intervention US contre le consulat iranien de la ville d’Arbil, dans la partie (autonome) kurde de l’Irak. Elle est faite comme si elle tendait inconsciemment \u00e0 justifier toutes les oppositions et les protestations contre la politique US en Irak, ses m\u00e9thodes, son aveuglement, ses effets d\u00e9stabilisateurs syst\u00e9matiques.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCette intervention a comme premier effet de tendre notablement les relations entre les USA et la seule entit\u00e9 irakienne (la r\u00e9gion kurde) jusqu’ici favorable \u00e0 l’intervention US dans le pays. Hier soir, on mentionnait le cas d’un d\u00e9tachement US motoris\u00e9 immobilis\u00e9 par des forces kurdes et \u00e9vacu\u00e9 par h\u00e9licopt\u00e8res.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’affaire du consulat d’Arbil est tr\u00e8s hasardeuse, comme toutes les brillantes op\u00e9rations mont\u00e9es \u00e0 partir du renseignement am\u00e9ricaniste, en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral s\u00fbr de lui pour passer des informations qui s’av\u00e8rent contestables, ce qui suscite des situations d\u00e9licates parce que ces informations sont aussit\u00f4t exploit\u00e9es avec brutalit\u00e9, sans aucun sens de la mesure et de la diplomatie. C’est, semble-t-il, le cas ici. Les Am\u00e9ricains affirment qu’il ne s’agit pas d’un consulat ; les Iraniens et les Kurdes affirment qu’il s’agit d’un consulat.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici ce qu’en dit l’\n<\/p>\n

\tThu Jan 11, 4:03 PM ET\u00a0\u00bb class=\u00a0\u00bbgen\u00a0\u00bb>AFP<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abA diplomatic row erupted after US forces arrested six people described by Iraqi and Iranian officials as the staff at an Iranian consulate in the northern Iraqi city of Arbil.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbTehran and the regional government of Iraqi Kurdistan accused US troops of raiding a diplomatic building which should have been protected under international law and demanded that the detainees be released.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBut in Washington, a Pentagon spokesman denied that the building was a consulate and insisted the captives are suspected of being closely tied to activities targeting Iraq and coalition forces.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWe don’t know the reason for this, an Iranian diplomat in Baghdad told AFP on condition of anonymity. The Americans arrested five employees and took all the computers and documentation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe building in Arbil was sealed off by Kurdish security forces, and local officials confirmed that there had been arrests by US forces.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe raid came just hours after US President George W. Bush announced he had ordered 21,500 more troops to Iraq and promised to take aggressive steps to curtail what he described as Iranian and Syrian help for insurgents.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 12 janvier 2007 \u00e0 06H16<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Il y a quelque chose d’\u00e9trange dans l’intervention US contre le consulat iranien de la ville d’Arbil, dans la partie (autonome) kurde de l’Irak. Elle est faite comme si elle tendait inconsciemment \u00e0 justifier toutes les oppositions et les protestations contre la politique US en Irak, ses m\u00e9thodes, son aveuglement, ses effets d\u00e9stabilisateurs syst\u00e9matiques. Cette… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6317,2773,4447,2807,2671],"class_list":["post-68400","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-consulat","tag-iran","tag-kurdes","tag-renseignement","tag-us"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68400","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68400"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68400\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68400"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68400"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68400"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}