{"id":68426,"date":"2007-01-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-01-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/18\/pour-saluer-le-depart-de-tony-blair-le-gouvernement-britannique-semble-tente-par-un-mea-culpa-general-sur-lirak\/"},"modified":"2007-01-18T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-01-18T00:00:00","slug":"pour-saluer-le-depart-de-tony-blair-le-gouvernement-britannique-semble-tente-par-un-mea-culpa-general-sur-lirak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/18\/pour-saluer-le-depart-de-tony-blair-le-gouvernement-britannique-semble-tente-par-un-mea-culpa-general-sur-lirak\/","title":{"rendered":"Pour saluer le d\u00e9part de Tony Blair, le gouvernement britannique semble tent\u00e9 par un mea culpa<\/em> g\u00e9n\u00e9ral sur l’Irak"},"content":{"rendered":"

Il semble de plus en plus possible, sinon probable, que le d\u00e9part de Tony Blair sera salu\u00e9 par un mea culpa<\/em> g\u00e9n\u00e9ral du gouvernement travailliste en ce qui concerne l’Irak. L’impression grandissante \u00e0 Londres est que les ministres de l’actuel gouvernement, Brown en t\u00eate, sans doute, attendent le d\u00e9part du Premier ministre pour signifier au parti travailliste, au Parlement et aux \u00e9lecteurs qu’ils n’ont finalement rien \u00e0 voir avec cette pitoyable et grotesque aventure. Blair emm\u00e8nerait son legs avec lui, selon une proc\u00e9dure qui mettrait en lumi\u00e8re l’\u00e9tonnant anachronisme qu’a constitu\u00e9 sa direction dans les deux-trois derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa chose pourrait m\u00eame \u00eatre couronn\u00e9e par une enqu\u00eate, une id\u00e9e que Blair a toujours refus\u00e9e, qui devrait donner des r\u00e9sultats assez peu reluisants quant \u00e0 l’action du gouvernement sous l’impulsion de ce Premier ministre. La politique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale du Royaume-Uni pourrait \u00eatre incurv\u00e9e par cette proc\u00e9dure, car les r\u00e9sultats de l’enqu\u00eate et la r\u00e9pudiation de l’affaire irakienne par le gouvernement-sans-Blair auraient \u00e9videmment des effets tr\u00e8s marquants sur les relations avec les USA. Bush, enferm\u00e9 dans son bunker<\/em>, y verrait une trahison de l’ami britannique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tC’est aujourd’hui<\/a> que le Guardian<\/em> rapporte les premi\u00e8res indications de cette \u00e9volution qui pourrait s’av\u00e9rer politiquement tr\u00e8s importante.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abLabour will have to admit that serious errors have been made over the war in Iraq if it is to restore public trust in the government, a growing number of ministers believe. The acknowledgment may come when the chancellor, Gordon Brown, takes over in Downing Street, possibly by launching an inquiry into the conduct of the war – a move that has been resisted by Tony Blair.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe impetus for Labour to show contrition has come from admissions by four ministers, who have gone on the record to concede that a string of errors was made in Iraq. Hilary Benn, the international development secretary, told the Fabian Society: The current situation in Iraq is absolutely grim, so let us be clear about that truth. Look, the intelligence was wrong, the de-Ba’athification went too far, the disbanding of the army was wrong and, of course, we should have the humility to acknowledge those things, and to learn. I am not insensitive to the huge well of bitterness and anger from lots of people in the party.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbPeter Hain, the Northern Ireland secretary, also claims in an interview to be published today by the New Statesman: The neo-con mission has failed … It’s not only failed to provide a coherent international policy, it’s failed wherever it’s been tried, and it’s failed with the American electorate, who kicked it into touch last November. The problem for us as a government … was actually to maintain a working relationship with what was the most rightwing American administration, if not ever, then in living memory.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbA fast-rising Blairite minister, James Purnell, has also admitted that the Iraq war has lacked moral legitimacy and made other military interventions in crises such as Darfur more difficult.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 18 janvier 2007 \u00e0 16H47<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Il semble de plus en plus possible, sinon probable, que le d\u00e9part de Tony Blair sera salu\u00e9 par un mea culpa g\u00e9n\u00e9ral du gouvernement travailliste en ce qui concerne l’Irak. L’impression grandissante \u00e0 Londres est que les ministres de l’actuel gouvernement, Brown en t\u00eate, sans doute, attendent le d\u00e9part du Premier ministre pour signifier au… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[705,5115,4739,857,5114],"class_list":["post-68426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-blair","tag-culpa","tag-enquete","tag-irak","tag-mea"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68426"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68426\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}