{"id":68434,"date":"2007-01-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-01-21T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/21\/liran-devient-de-plus-en-plus-problematique-pour-gw\/"},"modified":"2007-01-21T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-01-21T00:00:00","slug":"liran-devient-de-plus-en-plus-problematique-pour-gw","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/21\/liran-devient-de-plus-en-plus-problematique-pour-gw\/","title":{"rendered":"L’Iran devient de plus en plus probl\u00e9matique pour GW"},"content":{"rendered":"

Comme cela apparaissait avec les suites imm\u00e9diates du discours du 10 janvier, l’Iran est entr\u00e9 dans l’ar\u00e8ne de la contestation du Congr\u00e8s. Jusqu’alors assur\u00e9e d’une sorte de statut de tabou au contraire du conflit irakien, la guerre projet\u00e9e contre l’Iran fait d\u00e9sormais<\/a> partie des mati\u00e8res soumises \u00e0 contestation. Avec sa manuvre tactique du 10 janvier (\u00e9largir le conflit irakien \u00e0 l’Iran pour justifier des mesures agressives contre l’Iran), GW a fait une erreur strat\u00e9gique majeure. Vieille habitude.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tUn signe important de cette \u00e9volution, c’est la prise de position du s\u00e9nateur John D. Rockefeller IV, d\u00e9mocrate de Virginie occidentale et descendant de la prestigieuse famille. Rockefeller occupe une place importante, \u00e0 la t\u00eate de la commission sur le renseignement. C’est lui qui serait charg\u00e9 de superviser les preuves de diverses manigances iraniennes, au cas o\u00f9 GW chercherait un casus belli<\/em> contre ce pays. Il appara\u00eet \u00e9vident que, cette fois, cela n’aurait rien \u00e0 voir avec ce qui s’est pass\u00e9 avant l’invasion de l’Irak. Rockefeller y fait d’ailleurs explicitement allusion, avertissant par cons\u00e9quent que le S\u00e9nat n’aura certainement pas la m\u00eame attitude que celle qu’il eut \u00e0 l’\u00e9poque.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSelon le New York Times<\/em> du 20 janvier<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abSenator John D. Rockefeller IV, the West Virginia Democrat who took control of the committee this month, said that the administration was building a case against Tehran even as American intelligence agencies still know little about either Iran’s internal dynamics or its intentions in the Middle East.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbTo be quite honest, I’m a little concerned that it’s Iraq again, Senator Rockefeller said during an interview in his office. This whole concept of moving against Iran is bizarre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbMr. Rockefeller said he believed President Bush was getting poor advice from advisers who argue that an uncompromising stance toward the government in Tehran will serve American interests.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI don’t think that policy makers in this administration particularly understand Iran, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe comments of Mr. Rockefeller reflect the mounting concerns being voiced by other influential Democrats, including the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, and Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware, about the Bush administration’s approach to Iran. The Democrats have warned that the administration is moving toward a confrontation with Iran when the United States has neither the military resources nor the support among American allies and members of Congress to carry out such a move.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 21 janvier 2007 \u00e0 08H08<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Comme cela apparaissait avec les suites imm\u00e9diates du discours du 10 janvier, l’Iran est entr\u00e9 dans l’ar\u00e8ne de la contestation du Congr\u00e8s. Jusqu’alors assur\u00e9e d’une sorte de statut de tabou au contraire du conflit irakien, la guerre projet\u00e9e contre l’Iran fait d\u00e9sormais partie des mati\u00e8res soumises \u00e0 contestation. Avec sa manuvre tactique du 10 janvier… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2773,2807,5557],"class_list":["post-68434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-iran","tag-renseignement","tag-rockefeller"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68434"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68434\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}