celui de 2006<\/a>. Il semble qu’on soit conduit \u00e0 dire qu’une partie importante \u00e9tait consacr\u00e9e \u00e0 la question de l’\u00e9nergie. La fa\u00e7on dont les services de communication de la Maison-Blanche ont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 la chose, notamment \u00e0 la presse internationale, a montr\u00e9 qu’effectivement il s’agissait du sujet que la pr\u00e9sidence voulait voir mettre en exergue. Cette insistance est elle-m\u00eame une s\u00e9rieuse indication de l’\u00e9tat d’esprit de la Maison-Blanche.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tL’opinion et la presse internationales \u00e9taient averties sur cela et la question soulev\u00e9e \u00e0 cette occasion \u00e9tait bien celle-ci : le pr\u00e9sident US va-t-il modifier sa position et se montrer attentif \u00e0 la crise climatique ? Selon cette fa\u00e7on de voir, on peut dire qu’il y a une r\u00e9elle d\u00e9ception. Bush a \u00e9videmment abord\u00e9 la question par les biais les plus r\u00e9ducteurs : s\u00e9curit\u00e9 d’approvisionnement en \u00e9nergie (par r\u00e9duction de la d\u00e9pendance ext\u00e9rieure), donc s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale. Le lien n’a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 fait avec la question de la crise climatique en tant que crise syst\u00e9mique globale, dont l’analyse g\u00e9n\u00e9rale qui est faite (n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de r\u00e9duire les \u00e9missions de CO2) rencontre en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral le plus grand scepticisme dans l’administration GW. Cela est confirm\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tLe commentaire du Guardian<\/em> de ce matin mesure ce scepticisme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abThe Bush administration last night embarked on an ambitious plan to confront America’s love affair with oil by setting a target for a huge reduction in consumption over the next 10 years.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbJoel Kaplan, White House deputy chief of staff, told reporters in a briefing hours before George Bush’s annual state of the union address that the president wanted Americans to cut petrol consumption by up to 20% by 2017. The move comes a year after Mr Bush described Americans as being addicted to oil.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbMr Bush has not suddenly gone green: he remains sceptical about climate change, continuing to insist that the case has still to be made on global warming. His proposal is motivated by security concerns the US’s dependence on oil from the volatile Middle East.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe president hopes the goal can be achieved through a sharp rise in alternative energy sources, primarily ethanol, that the government would mandate to be produced. The rest of the reduction would come from raising fuel economy standards for passenger cars, which have not been revised since 1990.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbHis enthusiasm for ethanol is shared by American farmers and Republicans representing heavily agricultural states.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbBut there will be immense scepticism among congressmen about whether his target is realistic. Mr Bush needs the support of Congress to get his plan put in place, but the mood on Capitol Hill towards the White House has been poisoned by the Iraq war, in particular his 21,500 troop increase a fortnight ago.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 24 janvier 2007 \u00e0 08H50<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Le 6\u00e8me discours sur l’\u00e9tat de l’Union de GW (hier soir \u00e0 Washington) \u00e9tait dans le mode mineur. Il n’y a plus rien des \u00e9clats des cinq premi\u00e8res ann\u00e9es, que ce soit the axis of evil (janvier 2002) ou les r\u00e9f\u00e9rences \u00e0 Dosto\u00efevski de 2005; il est plus en phase avec celui de 2006. Il… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3392,3228,2631,4396,4522,3756,3198,4419,4205],"class_list":["post-68443","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-climatique","tag-crise","tag-de","tag-energetique","tag-energie","tag-etat","tag-gw","tag-lunion","tag-securite"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68443","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68443"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68443\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68443"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68443"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68443"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}