{"id":68456,"date":"2007-01-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-01-27T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/27\/pelosi-et-son-bras-dhonneur-au-decision-maker\/"},"modified":"2007-01-27T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-01-27T00:00:00","slug":"pelosi-et-son-bras-dhonneur-au-decision-maker","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/27\/pelosi-et-son-bras-dhonneur-au-decision-maker\/","title":{"rendered":"Pelosi et son bras d’honneur au \u201cdecision-maker<\/em>\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

Contentons-nous de compter les coups d’une situation surr\u00e9aliste dans tous les actes qui la caract\u00e9risent. Surr\u00e9alisme globalis\u00e9, surr\u00e9alisme am\u00e9ricanis\u00e9, surr\u00e9alisme irakis\u00e9 et surr\u00e9alisme \u00e0 Washington, et ainsi de suite tout aussi surr\u00e9aliste ; et, bien entendu parce que c’est le plus d’entre tous, un pr\u00e9sident US compl\u00e8tement surr\u00e9aliste lui-m\u00eame, qui aurait fait le bonheur d’un Salvador Dali, qui aurait appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 le trrr\u00e8s int\u00e9rrressant comporrrtement d\u00e9strrructurrrantissime de ce surrr\u00e9alistique prrrr\u00e9sident am\u00e9rrricanistique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAlors, Pelosi s’y met. Alors que GW Bush croit ravir la vedette du monde aux abois pour de nouvelles informations, alors qu’il re\u00e7oit les chefs militaires \u00e0 la Maison-Blanche, Madam Speaker<\/em>, accompagn\u00e9e de son vieil ami, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 Murtha, dur de dur devenu anti-guerre et pr\u00e9sident de la puissante commission des forces arm\u00e9es de la Chambre, s’en va visiter de son propre chef et sans avertissement Bagdad et l’Irak. Elle rencontre le Premier ministre et visite les troupes. Les uns et les autres ne savent plus \u00e0 qui ils ont affaire, qui commande ici, l\u00e0-bas et maintenant<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tQuelques nouvelles de la chose nous sont donn\u00e9es par Tom Raum, de AP, le 26 janvier<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s visit to Iraq is a clear sign the newly empowered Democratic Congress is not going to abide by the notion that foreign policy is the sole province of the White House.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWhile President Bush met with military leaders in the Oval Office Friday, she and anti-war Rep. Jack Murtha turned up in Baghdad.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe timing of the trip, from the Bush administration’s point of view, couldn’t have been worse. It came just days after the president asked Congress in his State of the Union address to give his revised Iraq strategy a chance to work.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIt also provided for dueling photo ops: Bush at the White House with his commanders and Pelosi and her congressional delegation in the heavily fortified Green Zone with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. The lawmakers also visited U.S. troops on what they billed as a fact-finding mission and one to thank our troops.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWhile the administration did not take issue with the visit by Pelosi and Murtha, Bush on Friday had a message for congressional opponents who want to stop his plan to increase U.S. troop strength in Iraq. I’m the decision-maker on the war effort, he said.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tQue se passe-t-il? Explications du professeur Emeritus<\/em> de politique \u00e0 Princeton University, Fred Greenstein : \u00abThey see blood is in the water. It’s sort of the idealized view: that politics stops at the water’s edge and the president is commander in chief and the chief diplomat. But members of Congress see a president who is in his low 30s in approval, they need to be re-elected and they know what their constituents are for.<\/em>\u00bb Notre explication : the<\/em> bordel.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLitt\u00e9ralement, le pouvoir flotte quelque part entre le Capitole et la Maison-Blanche, tant\u00f4t \u00e0 un bout du Mall, au pied du Capitole, tant\u00f4t \u00e0 l’autre, vers la Maison-Blanche. Personne n’en fait un drame parce qu’il faut \u00e9viter au plus qu’il se peut de faire quelque drame que ce soit, qui acc\u00e9l\u00e9rerait la chute dans les sondages ou compromettrait les \u00e9lections de 2008. Le fait est simplement que la Constitution la plus proche de la perfection de l’histoire de la civilisation n’a pas pr\u00e9vu cela, ni GW et 11\/9, ni l’Irak, ni le 7 novembre 2006 et Pelosi. Le fait est que, par temps de crise climatique, il est impossible de pr\u00e9voir le temps qu’il fera demain. Personne n’a rien pr\u00e9vu de ce qui se passe aujourd’hui et, aussi bien que pour le cas<\/a> des perspectives de l’attaque bushiste contre l’Iran, pour celui de la situation du pouvoir \u00e0 Washington vous \u00eates en terra incognita<\/em>. Bonne promenade.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 27 janvier 2007 \u00e0 16H11<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Contentons-nous de compter les coups d’une situation surr\u00e9aliste dans tous les actes qui la caract\u00e9risent. Surr\u00e9alisme globalis\u00e9, surr\u00e9alisme am\u00e9ricanis\u00e9, surr\u00e9alisme irakis\u00e9 et surr\u00e9alisme \u00e0 Washington, et ainsi de suite tout aussi surr\u00e9aliste ; et, bien entendu parce que c’est le plus d’entre tous, un pr\u00e9sident US compl\u00e8tement surr\u00e9aliste lui-m\u00eame, qui aurait fait le bonheur d’un… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6370,6371,6372,857,4376,6116,3248],"class_list":["post-68456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bordel","tag-bras","tag-dhonneur","tag-irak","tag-murtha","tag-palosi","tag-washington"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68456"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68456\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}