{"id":68464,"date":"2007-01-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-01-30T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/30\/quelques-dizaines-de-milliers-100000-500000\/"},"modified":"2007-01-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-01-30T00:00:00","slug":"quelques-dizaines-de-milliers-100000-500000","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/01\/30\/quelques-dizaines-de-milliers-100000-500000\/","title":{"rendered":"Quelques dizaines de milliers, 100.000, 500.000 ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Bien chaotique, la couverture par la presse la plus libre du monde de la manifestation anti-guerre de Washington, du 27 janvier 2007. Aujourd&rsquo;hui, trois jours apr\u00e8s qu&rsquo;elle ait eu lieu, il semble bien que cette manifestation soit la plus importante jamais r\u00e9alis\u00e9e contre la guerre en Irak. Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 extr\u00eamement difficile d&rsquo;en arriver \u00e0 cette conclusion.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  Samedi, on parlait de quelques dizaines de milliers, d\u00e9compte r\u00e9percut\u00e9 notamment par <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/ap\/20070128\/ap_on_re_us\/iraq_protest_18;_ylt=AqSE2mCyeBjz38S2IzJdITpX6GMA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl\" class=\"gen\">AP<\/a> (et repris par le New York <em>Times<\/em>). Dans le texte d&rsquo;AP, pour que la cause soit entendue, on indiquait : \u00ab<em>United for Peace and Justice, a coalition group sponsoring the protest, had hoped 100,000 would come. They claimed even more afterward, but police, who no longer give official estimates, said privately the crowd was smaller than 100,000.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  Le lendemain, les m\u00e9dias MSM parl\u00e9s et t\u00e9l\u00e9visuels \u00e9taient particuli\u00e8rement discrets \u00e0 propos de l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement. Le groupe FAIR, sp\u00e9cialis\u00e9 dans la surveillance des m\u00e9dias, a publi\u00e9 une <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fair.org\/index.php?page=3035\" class=\"gen\">analyse<\/a> de ce comportement. Il note : \u00ab<em>One day after an anti-war rally in Washington, D.C. attracted a crowd estimated at 100,000 by the Los Angeles Times, the networks&rsquo; Sunday morning talk shows remained mostly unaffected by the expression of broad opposition to the war, keeping their discussions confined to the narrow spectrum of Beltway elites.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  Les 100.000 participants mentionn\u00e9s par le Los Angeles <em>Times<\/em>, selon FAIR, sont d\u00e9pass\u00e9s par la comptabilit\u00e9 de <em>The Nation<\/em>, le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/views07\/0128-21.htm\" class=\"gen\">28 janvier<\/a>, qui parle de plusieurs centaines de milliers de personnes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  Hier, 29 janvier, deux jours apr\u00e8s la manifestation, la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 semble se situer d\u00e9sormais \u00e0 un niveau consid\u00e9rable, selon <a href=\"http:\/\/www.commondreams.org\/headlines07\/0129-03.htm\" class=\"gen\">IPS<\/a> : \u00ab<em>Peace activists from across the United States gathered in Washington Saturday for what they said was the largest demonstration to date against the Iraq war. It&rsquo;s time for a new day, the Reverend Jesse Jackson told what organizers estimated as a crowd of 500,000 demonstrators gathered outside the halls of Congress on the National Mall.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tQuel dommage que cette manifestation n&rsquo;ait pas \u00e9t\u00e9 marqu\u00e9e par une couleur approuv\u00e9e par le d\u00e9partement d&rsquo;Etat (orange, par exemple) et qu&rsquo;elle n&rsquo;ait pas eu lieu dans un pays de d\u00e9mocratie avanc\u00e9e comme l&rsquo;Ukraine ou la G\u00e9orgie. Quelle curiosit\u00e9 de voir, \u00e0 notre \u00e9poque de communication si rapide, si intense, et au cur de ce qui est connu comme l&#8217;empire de la communication, cette lenteur, cette pusillanimit\u00e9 \u00e0 rapporter des appr\u00e9ciations convenables d&rsquo;un tel \u00e9v\u00e9nement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa manifestation et ses suites ont d\u00e9montr\u00e9 que, malgr\u00e9 l&rsquo;extraordinaire d\u00e9b\u00e2cle de GW Bush,  ou \u00e0 cause d&rsquo;elle, justement ?  c&rsquo;est tout l&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em> qui se sent concern\u00e9, menac\u00e9 par les r\u00e9actions de m\u00e9contentement populaire et l&rsquo;opposition \u00e0 la guerre. A cet \u00e9gard, les \u00e9lections du 7 novembre 2006 n&rsquo;ont pas chang\u00e9 fondamentalement les choses. Mani\u00e8re responsable comme une autre de d\u00e9fendre une conception de la d\u00e9mocratie.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 30 janvier 2007 \u00e0 14H19<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bien chaotique, la couverture par la presse la plus libre du monde de la manifestation anti-guerre de Washington, du 27 janvier 2007. Aujourd&rsquo;hui, trois jours apr\u00e8s qu&rsquo;elle ait eu lieu, il semble bien que cette manifestation soit la plus importante jamais r\u00e9alis\u00e9e contre la guerre en Irak. Il a \u00e9t\u00e9 extr\u00eamement difficile d&rsquo;en arriver \u00e0&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5634,3620,3364,3248],"class_list":["post-68464","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-antiguerre","tag-manifestation","tag-presse","tag-washington"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68464","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68464"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68464\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68464"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68464"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68464"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}