{"id":68491,"date":"2007-02-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-05T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/05\/les-russes-realistes-pour-eux-les-usa-sont-le-pays-le-plus-destabilisant-dans-les-relations-internationales\/"},"modified":"2007-02-05T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-05T00:00:00","slug":"les-russes-realistes-pour-eux-les-usa-sont-le-pays-le-plus-destabilisant-dans-les-relations-internationales","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/05\/les-russes-realistes-pour-eux-les-usa-sont-le-pays-le-plus-destabilisant-dans-les-relations-internationales\/","title":{"rendered":"Les Russes r\u00e9alistes : pour eux, les USA sont le pays le plus d\u00e9stabilisant dans les relations internationales"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le ministre russe des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res Serge\u00ef Lavrov a donn\u00e9 certaines estimations et jugements sur les relations diplomatiques avec les USA. Son appr\u00e9ciation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale est assez s\u00e9v\u00e8re,  ou bien dira-t-on : r\u00e9aliste? Lavrov n&rsquo;h\u00e9site pas \u00e0 dire que les USA sont sans doute le plus difficile partenaire de la Russie.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUn extrait d&rsquo;un article du Washington <em>Post<\/em> dat\u00e9 d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/02\/04\/AR2007020400870_pf.html\" class=\"gen\">hier<\/a> et reprenant des extraits d&rsquo;une interview de Lavrov \u00e0 Interfax.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Like any other country, we are interested in having good, smooth, clear relations with the United States but it is not easy, Interfax quoted Lavrov as saying in an interview on state-run television.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>While Moscow and Washington have been able to achieve mutually acceptable results on many issues, the United States is not an easy partner at all  probably the most difficult partner, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The remarks reflected the troubled ties between the former Cold War foes, despite avowals of common aims on matters such as terrorism and weapons proliferation. Relations have been strained by disagreements over an array of international issues as well as Russia&rsquo;s record on democracy under President Vladimir Putin.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Russia sharply criticized the U.S. invasion of Iraq and has sought to counter what it has suggested are Washington&rsquo;s uncompromising positions on the nuclear programs of Iran and North Korea.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Lavrov repeated criticism he made in Washington last week, when he rebuked the Bush administration for its resistance to diplomacy with certain Middle East governments. He suggested the U.S. was being shortsighted by not engaging countries that could help resolve problems in Iraq, Lebanon and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The Middle East settlement has been suspended because, despite our position and the position of the European Union, Washington has conducted policy based on the principle, He who is not with us is against us,&rsquo; Lavrov said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>He said the United States was isolating Iran, Syria, Hamas and Hezbollah even though they were key actors in solving the Middle East puzzle.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCes d\u00e9clarations de Lavrov viennent notamment apr\u00e8s des d\u00e9clarations du g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Makhmout Gareev, pr\u00e9sident de l&rsquo;Acad\u00e9mie des sciences militaires de Moscou. Ces d\u00e9clarations ont \u00e9t\u00e9 faites dans le cours d&rsquo;une interview de Viktor Litovkine (Novosti) sur la nouvelle doctrine militaire russe, le 20 janvier, lors d&rsquo;une conf\u00e9rence de l&rsquo;Acad\u00e9mie, interview qu&rsquo;on retrouve sur le R\u00e9seau Voltaire, en date du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.voltairenet.org\/article144842.html\" class=\"gen\">26 janvier<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDe ce tableau doctrinal et militaire extr\u00eamement large trac\u00e9 par Gareev, nous retenons ce court mais significatif passage : <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>L&rsquo;analyse des tendances du d\u00e9veloppement de la situation internationale montre que la politique suivie par les \u00c9tats-Unis conduira in\u00e9vitablement \u00e0 la confrontation avec une partie importante du monde. Et les conditions sont en train d&rsquo;\u00eatre objectivement r\u00e9unies pour une intervention de la Russie en qualit\u00e9 d&rsquo;arbitre g\u00e9opolitique.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCes diverses d\u00e9clarations, notamment celles de Lavrov, particuli\u00e8rement remarquables pour un ministre des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res, montrent que la Russie a une conscience tr\u00e8s aigu\u00eb de la position et du comportement am\u00e9ricanistes. C&rsquo;est certainement la puissance la mieux arm\u00e9e psychologiquement,  outre son potentiel plus conventionnel,  pour affronter l&rsquo;\u00e9volution des USA. L&rsquo;exp\u00e9rience de la Guerre froide joue \u00e9videmment, mais moins fortement qu&rsquo;on pourrait croire, la p\u00e9riode Gorbatchev-Eltsine ayant vraiment laiss\u00e9 croire aux Russes qu&rsquo;une r\u00e9elle coop\u00e9ration \u00e9tait engag\u00e9e avec les USA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAujourd&rsquo;hui, les Russes n&rsquo;en doutent plus. Les USA sont le plus grand danger de d\u00e9stabilisation dans le monde, avec tous les risques qui vont avec.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 5 janvier 2007 \u00e0 17H35<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le ministre russe des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res Serge\u00ef Lavrov a donn\u00e9 certaines estimations et jugements sur les relations diplomatiques avec les USA. Son appr\u00e9ciation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale est assez s\u00e9v\u00e8re, ou bien dira-t-on : r\u00e9aliste? Lavrov n&rsquo;h\u00e9site pas \u00e0 dire que les USA sont sans doute le plus difficile partenaire de la Russie. Un extrait d&rsquo;un article du&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6407,3067,6406,2830,2884,2804],"class_list":["post-68491","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-dangereux","tag-doctrine","tag-gareev","tag-lavrov","tag-russe","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68491","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68491"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68491\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68491"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68491"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68491"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}