{"id":68508,"date":"2007-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-10T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/10\/notre-chronique-reguliere-de-lattaque-surprise-plutot-next-year-a-teheran\/"},"modified":"2007-02-10T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-10T00:00:00","slug":"notre-chronique-reguliere-de-lattaque-surprise-plutot-next-year-a-teheran","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/10\/notre-chronique-reguliere-de-lattaque-surprise-plutot-next-year-a-teheran\/","title":{"rendered":"Notre chronique r\u00e9guli\u00e8re de l’attaque-surprise : plut\u00f4t next year<\/em> \u00e0 T\u00e9h\u00e9ran"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’attaque-surprise contre l’Iran est devenue un des grands sujets de tout bloc-notes qui se respecte. Nous avons donc r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement des annonces et des effets d’annonce. Cette fois (aujourd’hui), il s’agit du Guardian<\/em> .<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBien que farci de pr\u00e9visions et de d\u00e9tails sur les forces d\u00e9ploy\u00e9es et ainsi de suite, bien que pr\u00e9sentant l’option de l’attaque comme tr\u00e8s probable, l’article est tr\u00e8s largement circonspect pour une attaque dans les semaines qui viennent malgr\u00e9 le titre accrocheur \u00e0 cet \u00e9gard (\u00abTarget Iran: US able to strike in the spring<\/em>\u00bb). En fait, il semble qu’il faille attendre plut\u00f4t 2008. Dont acte en attendant la pr\u00e9diction suivante.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe present military build-up in the Gulf would allow the US to mount an attack by the spring. But the sources said that if there was an attack, it was more likely next year, just before Mr Bush leaves office.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbNeo-conservatives, particularly at the Washington-based American Enterprise Institute, are urging Mr Bush to open a new front against Iran. So too is the vice-president, Dick Cheney. The state department and the Pentagon are opposed, as are Democratic congressmen and the overwhelming majority of Republicans. The sources said Mr Bush had not yet made a decision. The Bush administration insists the military build-up is not offensive but aimed at containing Iran and forcing it to make diplomatic concessions. The aim is to persuade Tehran to curb its suspect nuclear weapons programme and abandon ambitions for regional expansion.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbRobert Gates, the new US defence secretary, said yesterday: I don’t know how many times the president, secretary [of state Condoleezza] Rice and I have had to repeat that we have no intention of attacking Iran.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBut Vincent Cannistraro, a Washington-based intelligence analyst, shared the sources’ assessment that Pentagon planning was well under way. Planning is going on, in spite of public disavowals by Gates. Targets have been selected. For a bombing campaign against nuclear sites, it is quite advanced. The military assets to carry this out are being put in place.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbHe added: We are planning for war. It is incredibly dangerous. Mr Cannistraro, who worked for the CIA and the National Security Council, stressed that no decision had been made.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 10 f\u00e9vrier 2007 \u00e0 08H58<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’attaque-surprise contre l’Iran est devenue un des grands sujets de tout bloc-notes qui se respecte. Nous avons donc r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement des annonces et des effets d’annonce. Cette fois (aujourd’hui), il s’agit du Guardian . Bien que farci de pr\u00e9visions et de d\u00e9tails sur les forces d\u00e9ploy\u00e9es et ainsi de suite, bien que pr\u00e9sentant l’option de l’attaque… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4906,2870,3984,2773,5013],"class_list":["post-68508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-4906","tag-attaque","tag-gates","tag-iran","tag-surprise"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68508","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68508"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68508\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}