{"id":68522,"date":"2007-02-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-13T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/13\/rien-ne-va-dans-les-budgets-lavion-ne-marche-pas-achetons-plus-de-f-22-conclut-lusaf\/"},"modified":"2007-02-13T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-13T00:00:00","slug":"rien-ne-va-dans-les-budgets-lavion-ne-marche-pas-achetons-plus-de-f-22-conclut-lusaf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/13\/rien-ne-va-dans-les-budgets-lavion-ne-marche-pas-achetons-plus-de-f-22-conclut-lusaf\/","title":{"rendered":"Rien ne va dans les budgets, l’avion ne marche pas, \u2014 achetons plus de F-22 conclut l’USAF"},"content":{"rendered":"

Essayons de traiter ce sujet r\u00e9barbatif sous une forme plaisante, comme on peut, \u00e0 notre fa\u00e7on un peu poussive.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tFaisons cela sous forme de charade.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tMon premier est que l’USAF ne va pas bien du tout<\/a>, qu’il lui manque au moins $20 milliards par an pendant vingt ans. (Pas temps de faire des d\u00e9penses inutiles.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tMon second est que le F-22 Raptor<\/em> nous fait des dr\u00f4les de surprises. Il ne marche pas<\/a> dans les guerres actuelles. (Citation immortelle, \u00e0 relire : \u00abThe stealthy Raptor fighter and intelligence-gathering aircraft is ready for war, but probably not the war we’ve got, says Air Combat Command’s chief, Gen. Ronald E. Keys.<\/em> [] If war breaks out, I’m sending the F-22, Keys told Aviation Week & Space Technology last week. But not for operations in Iraq or Afghanistan. I didn’t buy the F-22 for Iraq<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tMon tout est que l’USAF envisage des manuvres pressantes pour acheter plus<\/strong> de F-22 Raptor<\/em>. CQFD, en quelque sorte. Donc, essayons d’en avoir 381 plut\u00f4t que 183 (ce qui, nous dit notre petit doigt, ne fera pas l’affaire de notre prot\u00e9g\u00e9 JSF, devenu le petit canard de la chasse au canard<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl est vrai, nous instruit Defense News<\/em> ce 12 f\u00e9vrier<\/a>, que le Raptor<\/em> fait des merveilles uniques et sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent dans les exercices a\u00e9riens d’\u00e9valuation contr\u00f4l\u00e9s par l’USAF et destin\u00e9s \u00e0 nous prouver que le Raptor<\/em> fait des merveilles uniques et sans pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent, et ainsi de suite (\u00ab the Raptor’s impressive performance at the 2006 Northern Edge joint force-on-force exercise in Alaska, where the F-22 flew 102 of 105 scheduled sorties with 108 kills and one accidental hit<\/em>\u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici les faits :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abAs Lockheed Martin officials handed over the ceremonial keys to the U.S. Air Force Pacific Command’s first F-22 Raptor, the service’s No. 2 official said the Air Force is looking at funding plans for buying more than the planned 183 stealth fighters.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe 2007 budget contains multi-year funding for the last 60 planned Raptors, including construction funds for 2007 and advance procurement money through 2009. The president’s 2008 budget proposal includes $281.9 million for the F-22 program.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAir Force Vice Chief of Staff Gen. John Corley said Feb. 12 that the 2009 budget must contain more advanced procurement funding if Raptor production is to continue beyond 2009.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tThe Air Force is examining exactly that at the present time, Corley said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbAs recently as last week’s Air Force Association conference in Florida, senior Air Force officials said numerous Pentagon studies show that the service will need more than the 183 Raptors to complete future missions, but would not commit to a final number. Corley said 381 planes remains the stated requirement.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 13 f\u00e9vrier 2007 \u00e0 09H03<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Essayons de traiter ce sujet r\u00e9barbatif sous une forme plaisante, comme on peut, \u00e0 notre fa\u00e7on un peu poussive. Faisons cela sous forme de charade. Mon premier est que l’USAF ne va pas bien du tout, qu’il lui manque au moins $20 milliards par an pendant vingt ans. (Pas temps de faire des d\u00e9penses inutiles.)… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3127,249,250,3859,41],"class_list":["post-68522","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-budget","tag-f-22","tag-jsf","tag-raptor","tag-usaf"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68522","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68522"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68522\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68522"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68522"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68522"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}