{"id":68527,"date":"2007-02-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-14T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/14\/gw-et-kim-meme-triste-combat\/"},"modified":"2007-02-14T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-14T00:00:00","slug":"gw-et-kim-meme-triste-combat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/14\/gw-et-kim-meme-triste-combat\/","title":{"rendered":"GW et Kim, m\u00eame triste combat"},"content":{"rendered":"

GW et Kim, m\u00eame triste combat<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Apr\u00e8s avoir, selon les meilleures sources, fr\u00f4l\u00e9 l’apocalypse \u00e0 plusieurs reprises<\/a> l’ann\u00e9e derni\u00e8re<\/a>, la crise nord-cor\u00e9enne se d\u00e9gonfle piteusement ou heureusement c’est selon. Les commentateurs MSM se trouvent oblig\u00e9s de mettre GW Bush, pr\u00e9sident des USA, et Kim Jong Il, dictateur notoire, crasseux et d\u00e9coiff\u00e9, dans la m\u00eame gal\u00e8re, — celle des batailles rat\u00e9es et des retraites honteuses. Ainsi l’accord USA-Cor\u00e9e du Nord termine-t-il, temporairement ou pas c’est selon, d’une mani\u00e8re piteuse une crise \u00e0 r\u00e9p\u00e9tition, et autant de fois gonfl\u00e9e artificiellement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

L’entame de l’article de David E. Sanger sur le sujet, aujourd’hui<\/a> dans l’International Herald Tribune<\/em>, donne la mesure de la chute de la puissance US. (Pour la Cor\u00e9e du Nord, on se permettra de penser qu’il n’y a chute de rien du tout, ce pays n’ayant jamais repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 la moindre puissance.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»It is hard to imagine that either George W. Bush or Kim Jong Il would have agreed even a year ago to the kind of deal they have now approved. The pact, announced Tuesday, would stop, seal and ultimately disable North Korea’s nuclear facilities, as part of a grand bargain that the administration has previously shunned as overly generous to a repressive country — especially one that has not yet said when or if it will give up its nuclear arsenal.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»But in the past few months, the world has changed for both Bush and Kim, two men who have made clear how deeply they detest each other. Both are beset by huge problems, and both needed some kind of breakthrough.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

«For Bush, bogged down in Iraq, his authority undercut by the November elections, any chance to show progress in peacefully disarming a country that detonated a nuclear test just four months ago could no longer be passed up. As one senior administration official said over the weekend, the prospect that Bush might leave Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and North Korea more dangerous places than he found them \u00a0\u00bbcan’t be very appealing.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Enfin, il ne vous \u00e9tonnera pas d’apprendre que John Bolton est furieux<\/a> et qu’il souhaite ardemment que GW retrouve toutes ses brillantes capacit\u00e9s :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

«\u00ab\u00a0This is a very bad deal,\u00a0\u00bb Bolton told CNN television, saying it contradicts Bush’s policy and would show US weakness at a time when it is challenging Iran over its controversial nuclear program. \u00ab\u00a0I’m hoping that the president has not been fully briefed on it and he still has time to reject it,\u00a0\u00bb he said.<\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 14 f\u00e9vrier 2007 \u00e0 10H09<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

GW et Kim, m\u00eame triste combat Apr\u00e8s avoir, selon les meilleures sources, fr\u00f4l\u00e9 l’apocalypse \u00e0 plusieurs reprises l’ann\u00e9e derni\u00e8re, la crise nord-cor\u00e9enne se d\u00e9gonfle piteusement ou heureusement c’est selon. Les commentateurs MSM se trouvent oblig\u00e9s de mettre GW Bush, pr\u00e9sident des USA, et Kim Jong Il, dictateur notoire, crasseux et d\u00e9coiff\u00e9, dans la m\u00eame gal\u00e8re,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5267,1092,3299,2651,3198,5584,3349,3004],"class_list":["post-68527","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-accord","tag-bolton","tag-coree","tag-du","tag-gw","tag-kim","tag-nord","tag-nucleaire"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68527","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68527"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68527\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68527"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}