Il est vrai que depuis qu’il est question de preuves des vilenies iraniennes en Irak, donc qu’il est question de nous refaire le coup de l’Irak, la presse US de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence change de ton. Elle semble abandonner bien vite ces attitudes critiques qu’il lui sembla devoir adopter apr\u00e8s le 7 novembre 2006 et l’expression de la col\u00e8re populaire, pour se r\u00e9fugier dans l’habituel suivisme conformiste des bonnes nouvelles donn\u00e9es par l’autorit\u00e9 supr\u00eame. (Quelle meilleure bonne nouvelle que d’apprendre que les Iraniens sont bien ces crapules qui m\u00e9ritent qu’on les attaque?)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tGreg Mitchell, de Editor & Publisher<\/em>, nous le signale d\u00e8s le 11 f\u00e9vrier<\/a>, \u00e0 propos d’un article du New York Times<\/em> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abSaturday <\/em>[11 February]‘s New York Times features an article, posted at the top of its Web site late Friday, that suggests very strongly that Iran is supplying the deadliest weapon aimed at American troops in Iraq. The author notes, Any assertion of an Iranian contribution to attacks on Americans in Iraq is both politically and diplomatically volatile.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWhat is the source of this volatile information? Nothing less than civilian and military officials from a broad range of government agencies.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbSound pretty convincing? Well, almost all the sources in the story are unnamed. It also may be worth noting that the author is Michael R. Gordon, the same Times reporter who, on his own, or with Judith Miller, wrote some of the key, and badly misleading or downright inaccurate, articles about Iraqi WMDs in the run-up to the 2003 invasion.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tSur le m\u00eame sujet, nous vous signalons ce commentaire introductif de BuzzFlash.com<\/em>, du 12 f\u00e9vrier<\/a>, introduisant une formidable interview de Robert Parry, \u00e9diteur du site http:\/\/www.consortiumnews.com\/<\/a>. (Nous reviendrons sur cette interview de Parry.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abOur interview with Parry is published at a timely moment.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbMuch to the shock of BuzzFlash readers, the mainstream press is once again going the route of letting the Busheviks \u00a0\u00bbframe\u00a0\u00bb America into a war. Not only is it using the same techniques and subterfuges that it used to lie us into the Iraq War, the media including the New York Times and Washington Post are once again swallowing the whole package after apologizing for being mindless cheerleaders of the deceit that led to the Iraq War.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbOf all the tragic ironies, the use of our GIs as bait in Iraq where we shouldn’t have been in the first place is being used to justify another war, with a country that was a natural enemy of Iraq until Bush invaded Baghdad. But don’t expect to find those truths or that context in the mainstream corporate press.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 14 f\u00e9vrier 2007 \u00e0 02H23<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Il est vrai que depuis qu’il est question de preuves des vilenies iraniennes en Irak, donc qu’il est question de nous refaire le coup de l’Irak, la presse US de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence change de ton. Elle semble abandonner bien vite ces attitudes critiques qu’il lui sembla devoir adopter apr\u00e8s le 7 novembre 2006 et l’expression de… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3845,6435,3878,6436,5147,3256,4464,6437,2852,3257],"class_list":["post-68531","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-article","tag-buzzflash","tag-conformisme","tag-editor","tag-gordon","tag-new","tag-parry","tag-publisher","tag-times","tag-york"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68531","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68531"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68531\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68531"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68531"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68531"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}