{"id":68541,"date":"2007-02-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/18\/le-grand-mystere-du-mou-uk-usa-sur-le-jsf\/"},"modified":"2007-02-18T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-18T00:00:00","slug":"le-grand-mystere-du-mou-uk-usa-sur-le-jsf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/18\/le-grand-mystere-du-mou-uk-usa-sur-le-jsf\/","title":{"rendered":"Le grand myst\u00e8re du MoU UK-USA sur le JSF"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bien entendu, toute notre attention continue \u00e0 \u00eatre concentr\u00e9e sur le destin du JSF. Ainsi avons-nous appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 ce courrier de notre lecteur P4, en ligne sur notre Forum<\/a> \u00e0 la date du 17 f\u00e9vrier. Il nous procure le lien d’un extrait<\/a> d’un rapport de la Commission de la d\u00e9fense des Communes sur les probl\u00e8mes des futurs porte-avions de la Royal Navy.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn y trouve un paragraphe consacr\u00e9 au JSF et \u00e0 son MoU entre les Britanniques et les Am\u00e9ricains, que voici :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe Committee welcomes the Memorandum of Understanding signed with the US in December on the Joint Strike Fighter following US assurances that the UK will be given all the technical information it requires to operate, maintain and upgrade the UK aircraft independently. But it says that the MoD would not provide the Committee with details of those assurances, and it has concerns about how things will work out in practice.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tNous avons \u00e9voqu\u00e9 cette question de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 des transferts de technologies dans les accords USA-UK \u00e0 deux<\/a> reprises sur ce site<\/a>, chaque fois en \u00e9mettant les doutes les plus pr\u00e9cis sur la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de ces transferts, en \u00e9voquant au contraire un accord UK-USA connect\u00e9 \u00e0 la question du scandale Yamamah<\/em>. Il ne nous semble pas, bien au contraire, que ce paragraphe assez d\u00e9senchant\u00e9, dans ce rapport de la Commission de d\u00e9fense des Communes, d\u00e9mente cette interpr\u00e9tation pour ce qui concerne le contenu du MoU.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tD’autres sont assez proches d’\u00eatre convaincus que les Britanniques n’ont rien obtenu d’essentiel, c’est-\u00e0-dire rien qui puisse leur assurer la souverainet\u00e9 op\u00e9rationnelle qu’ils proclamaient \u00eatre une condition sine qua non<\/em> de l’accord. C’est le cas de sources officielles chez les Australiens, proches du minist\u00e8re de la d\u00e9fense, qui soulignent que la transaction UK-USA est tr\u00e8s myst\u00e9rieuse. Une source officielle italienne estime que les Britanniques n’ont rien obtenu de plus que les Italiens en mati\u00e8re de transfert de technologies, \u00abet notamment rien sur les technologies furtives<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 18 f\u00e9vrier 2007 \u00e0 14H02<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bien entendu, toute notre attention continue \u00e0 \u00eatre concentr\u00e9e sur le destin du JSF. Ainsi avons-nous appr\u00e9ci\u00e9 ce courrier de notre lecteur P4, en ligne sur notre Forum \u00e0 la date du 17 f\u00e9vrier. Il nous procure le lien d’un extrait d’un rapport de la Commission de la d\u00e9fense des Communes sur les probl\u00e8mes des… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4787,5224,3442,250,6129,6444,2746,4096,3157,2758,2804],"class_list":["post-68541","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-australie","tag-communes","tag-italie","tag-jsf","tag-mou","tag-operationnelle","tag-souverainete","tag-technologies","tag-transfert","tag-uk","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68541","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68541"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68541\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68541"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68541"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68541"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}