Pr\u00e8s de trois semaines plus tard, qu’est devenue la d\u00e9claration tonitruante de Zbigniew Brzezinski au S\u00e9nat? On se rappelle nos troubles<\/a> divers \u00e0 ce propos<\/a>. Un autre auteur notamment, Barry Grey sur le site Global research<\/a>, s’est avis\u00e9 de l’\u00e9tranget\u00e9 de ces circonstances o\u00f9 de telles d\u00e9clarations, venues d’une telle personnalit\u00e9, rencontrent une discr\u00e9tion si grande.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tDiscr\u00e9tion, certes, mais pas discr\u00e9tion compl\u00e8te. Les d\u00e9clarations de Zbig, sous forme d’un article (cela fait moins solennel et c’est moins compromettant) qui nous semble reprendre mot pour mot une partie de son t\u00e9moignage, notamment la partie incrimin\u00e9e de l’hypoth\u00e8se de la provocation, sont reprises par un grand m\u00e9dia, le Los Angeles Times<\/em> le 13 f\u00e9vrier, et curieusement publi\u00e9es le jour pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent<\/a> par le San Francisco Chronicle<\/em> sous r\u00e9f\u00e9rence du Los Angeles Times<\/em>. William Pfaff signale \u00e9galement la d\u00e9position de Brzezinski et la question pol\u00e9mique abord\u00e9e dans un article du 14 f\u00e9vrier<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abIf that is not a sufficiently intimidating prospect, consider that an Israeli attack on Iran, which inevitably would produce Iranian retaliation against American forces in the region, or the deliberate American provocation whose possibility Brzezinski noted in his Senate testimony, could set this whole conflagration going, to the patriotic acclaim of part of the American public, all of the neo-conservatives, and to the (short-lived) satisfaction of Richard Cheney and George W. Bush.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLes ind\u00e9pendants (Pfaff notamment) doivent \u00e9videmment \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9s \u00e0 part, leur choix d’une citation de Brzezinski rel\u00e8ve du processus normal de leur travail. La politique instinctive des grands m\u00e9dias MSM, leur prudence paradoxalement censoriale mais n’impliquant pas une censure compl\u00e8te, notamment avec ce cas du Los Angeles Times<\/em> publiant la substance de la d\u00e9claration sous forme d’article, un jour apr\u00e8s le San Francisco Chronicle<\/em>, tendent \u00e0 confirmer le caract\u00e8re incendiaire de cette d\u00e9claration. Elles confirment qu’on peut risquer des hypoth\u00e8ses sur la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du sc\u00e9nario \u00e9voqu\u00e9 par Brzezinski, donc sur la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 d’une possible provocation, \u00aba terrorist act in the United States blamed on Iran<\/em>\u00bb. Dont acte.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2007 \u00e0 08H07<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Pr\u00e8s de trois semaines plus tard, qu’est devenue la d\u00e9claration tonitruante de Zbigniew Brzezinski au S\u00e9nat? On se rappelle nos troubles divers \u00e0 ce propos. Un autre auteur notamment, Barry Grey sur le site Global research, s’est avis\u00e9 de l’\u00e9tranget\u00e9 de ces circonstances o\u00f9 de telles d\u00e9clarations, venues d’une telle personnalit\u00e9, rencontrent une discr\u00e9tion si… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[354,370,2935,3525,1006,2773,2934,1131,5534,2852,6393],"class_list":["post-68543","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-354","tag-370","tag-angeles","tag-attentat","tag-brzezinski","tag-iran","tag-los","tag-pfaff","tag-provocation","tag-times","tag-zbig"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68543","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68543"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68543\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}