{"id":68544,"date":"2007-02-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/19\/scowcroft-dans-la-lutte-contre-la-crise-climatique-et-la-radicalisation-de-lopposition-des-moderes-a-gw-bush\/"},"modified":"2007-02-19T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-19T00:00:00","slug":"scowcroft-dans-la-lutte-contre-la-crise-climatique-et-la-radicalisation-de-lopposition-des-moderes-a-gw-bush","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/19\/scowcroft-dans-la-lutte-contre-la-crise-climatique-et-la-radicalisation-de-lopposition-des-moderes-a-gw-bush\/","title":{"rendered":"Scowcroft dans la lutte contre la crise climatique et la radicalisation de l’opposition des mod\u00e9r\u00e9s \u00e0 GW Bush"},"content":{"rendered":"

Le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Brent Scowcroft fut conseiller de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale de Bush-p\u00e8re et reste activement engag\u00e9 dans le camp mod\u00e9r\u00e9, contre l’extr\u00e9misme de Bush-fils. Steve C. Clemons, sur son site The Washington Note<\/a> d\u00e9couvre et nous fait d\u00e9couvrir que Scowcroft est \u00e9galement tr\u00e8s actif dans la lutte contre la crise climatique, aux c\u00f4t\u00e9s<\/a> de Al Gore<\/a>. Clemons se f\u00e9licite qu’un ancien militaire (Scowcroft \u00e9tait g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de l’USAF) s’int\u00e9resse \u00e0 cette question d’une fa\u00e7on si appuy\u00e9e, parce qu’il s’agit d’une mati\u00e8re de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale fondamentale : \u00abIt’s important to get generals, strategists, national security types in general thinking about climate change in their roster of threats facing the nation and to consider comprehensive national and international strategies to diminish that threat.<\/em>\u00bb (Le Pentagone s’est d\u00e9j\u00e0 int\u00e9ress\u00e9 \u00e0 la crise climatique, en 2004<\/a>, mais d’une fa\u00e7on n\u00e9gative, en r\u00e9pudiant un rapport qu’il avait lui-m\u00eame demand\u00e9.) <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDans la m\u00eame note, Clemons cite abondamment l’article de Anatol Lieven du 28 d\u00e9cembre 2006, sur lequel nous nous \u00e9tions attard\u00e9s<\/a>. Voici comment Clemons introduit la citation qu’il fait du texte de Lieven :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abEnough have persuasively argued that systemic planetary climate change is underway and represents an existential threat to our political and social systems as well as to humankind that I don’t need to repeat all this.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBut there haven’t been many that I know of who have really begun to seriously think through the national security and political dimensions of climate change. The analyses I have seen tend to speak to audiences that are already climate change policy advocates.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbOne very good piece written by a top tier national security commentator and colleague of mine, Anatol Lieven, pondered climate change’s social and political impact in his oped, The End of the West as We Know It?<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tClemons commente justement l’article de Lieven en remarquant : \u00abThe Lieven article is important in that he doesn’t write much about climate change.<\/em>\u00bb C’est effectivement impliquer, au terme de la logique ainsi d\u00e9couverte, que la crise climatique n’est pas une crise cat\u00e9gorielle mais une crise globale et syst\u00e9mique : crise de notre syst\u00e8me et de notre civilisation et pas seulement crise de l’environnement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl y a un m\u00eame courant d’appr\u00e9ciation et de pens\u00e9e entre ces divers noms, Scowcroft (Gore), Clemons, Lieven et les diff\u00e9rentes fa\u00e7ons de consid\u00e9rer le sujet de la crise climatique. Ce courant pr\u00e9sente une particularit\u00e9 commune : la radicalisation du jugement, alors que toutes ces personnes sont traditionnellement des mod\u00e9r\u00e9s politiques. Elles sont toutes, \u00e9galement et d’une fa\u00e7on ou l’autre, des anti-Bush.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn a l\u00e0 un processus capital que nous devrons explorer de plus en plus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment : la radicalisation extr\u00eame de la politique Bush, qui ne cesse pas, provoque l’opposition des mod\u00e9r\u00e9s, puis oblige ces mod\u00e9r\u00e9s \u00e0 radicaliser leurs positions, puis leurs appr\u00e9ciations g\u00e9n\u00e9rales. Dans ce cas pr\u00e9cis, on retrouve implicitement ce ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne, m\u00eame s’il n’est pas exprim\u00e9 : \u00e0 l’opposition radicale de l’\u00e9quipe Bush, appuy\u00e9e sur le nihilisme de l’industrie p\u00e9troli\u00e8re, \u00e0 l’existence m\u00eame de la crise climatique correspond une radicalisation du jugement sur la gravit\u00e9 de cette crise chez les mod\u00e9r\u00e9s qui s’opposent \u00e0 Bush \u00e9galement sur ce sujet.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 19 f\u00e9vrier 2007 \u00e0 11H52<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Brent Scowcroft fut conseiller de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale de Bush-p\u00e8re et reste activement engag\u00e9 dans le camp mod\u00e9r\u00e9, contre l’extr\u00e9misme de Bush-fils. Steve C. Clemons, sur son site The Washington Note d\u00e9couvre et nous fait d\u00e9couvrir que Scowcroft est \u00e9galement tr\u00e8s actif dans la lutte contre la crise climatique, aux c\u00f4t\u00e9s de Al Gore.… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[868,6179,3392,3228,4049,6450,6449,6448],"class_list":["post-68544","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bush","tag-clemons","tag-climatique","tag-crise","tag-lieven","tag-moderes","tag-radicalisation","tag-scowcroft"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68544","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68544"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68544\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68544"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}