{"id":68552,"date":"2007-02-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-22T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/22\/perle-aura-sa-biographie-autorisee-et-peut-etre-y-trouvera-t-on-lexplication-du-mystere-des-armes-de-destruction-massive-de-saddam\/"},"modified":"2007-02-22T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-22T00:00:00","slug":"perle-aura-sa-biographie-autorisee-et-peut-etre-y-trouvera-t-on-lexplication-du-mystere-des-armes-de-destruction-massive-de-saddam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/22\/perle-aura-sa-biographie-autorisee-et-peut-etre-y-trouvera-t-on-lexplication-du-mystere-des-armes-de-destruction-massive-de-saddam\/","title":{"rendered":"Perle aura sa biographie \u201cautoris\u00e9e\u201d et peut-\u00eatre y trouvera-t-on l’explication du \u201cmyst\u00e8re\u201d des armes de destruction massive de Saddam"},"content":{"rendered":"

Richard Perle a \u00e9t\u00e9 moins pr\u00e9sent ces trois derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es qu’il ne l’avait \u00e9t\u00e9 durant le premier mandat de GW Bush. Peut-\u00eatre sa carri\u00e8re approche-t-elle de son terme? Il semble prendre ses pr\u00e9cautions pour cette possibilit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSteve Clemons nous annonce<\/a> qu’un livre sur Perle va \u00eatre r\u00e9dig\u00e9, pour parution en novembre 2007, qui pourrait \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme une sorte de biographie autoris\u00e9e du fameux n\u00e9o-conservateur. Il s’agit de Prince of Darkness Richard Perle: The Kingdom, the Power, and the End of Empire in America<\/em>, par Alan Weisman.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tClemons commente :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abBut what caught my eye in this otherwise OK press announcement of a book not out until Thanksgiving this year was this bit:<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWhile not an authorized book, Perle has granted the author extraordinary access, with multiple one-on-one interviews.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbMaybe I’m just too skeptical of Perle’s willingness to cooperate. While Sterling may be a good publishing house, this is not a Seymour Hersh expose on him. Perle is probably cooperating because he thinks he can trade his stories in a quid pro quo deal for kind treatment in the book.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe publisher and writer must be aware of what animates Perle’s interest to cooperate. In such a release announcing a biography of not only a hugely influential foreign policy thinker but a hugely controversial personality who was part of the bandwagon that duped America into a reckless war against Iraq, it would be useful to know what the writer is doing beforehand to make sure that he is not in fact seriously manipulated by Perle who I admit is one of the most effectively shrewd, compelling, and frequently disturbing policy personalities in Washington.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbI still want to know what Richard Perle knew and when he knew it when he told me in October 2002 that we would not find WMDs in Iraq.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tEn effet, Clemons rapportait le 17 novembre 2004<\/a> cette rencontre avec Perle en octobre 2002 et cette \u00e9tonnante affirmation du m\u00eame Perle qu’on ne trouverait pas d’armes de destruction massive en Irak. Prudent, avis\u00e9 ou bien inform\u00e9 par anticipation, Perle expliquait que Saddam les cacherait ou les ferait d\u00e9truire avant que les Am\u00e9ricains aient pu s’en saisir (dans l’hypoth\u00e8se par ailleurs \u00e9vidente \u00e0 cette \u00e9poque d’une invasion US ). L’anecdote nous rappelle que Perle est sans doute d’une trempe diff\u00e9rente de celle de nombre de ses camarades des domaines neocon<\/em> et bushiste. Contrairement \u00e0 nombre d’entre eux, il semble qu’il n’ait pas \u00e9t\u00e9 virtualiste dans cette occurrence. Tout en se couvrant par rapport \u00e0 la version officielle, et en se gardant de mettre cette version en danger, il n’acceptait pas pour argent comptant les montages faits pour justifier l’attaque contre Saddam. Cette interpr\u00e9tation correspond \u00e0 ce qu’on devine du personnage puisqu’il admettait ainsi implicitement que, dans ce cas, la fin justifie tous les moyens.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tReste \u00e0 voir, ou \u00e0 lire, si l’on en saura plus l\u00e0-dessus dans sa biographie autoris\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 22 f\u00e9vrier 2007 \u00e0 05H17<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Richard Perle a \u00e9t\u00e9 moins pr\u00e9sent ces trois derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es qu’il ne l’avait \u00e9t\u00e9 durant le premier mandat de GW Bush. Peut-\u00eatre sa carri\u00e8re approche-t-elle de son terme? Il semble prendre ses pr\u00e9cautions pour cette possibilit\u00e9. Steve Clemons nous annonce qu’un livre sur Perle va \u00eatre r\u00e9dig\u00e9, pour parution en novembre 2007, qui pourrait \u00eatre… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3860,6179,3216,3213,981],"class_list":["post-68552","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-adm","tag-clemons","tag-neocon","tag-perle","tag-saddam"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68552","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68552"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68552\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68552"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68552"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}