{"id":68557,"date":"2007-02-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/23\/blair-contre-lattaque-de-liran\/"},"modified":"2007-02-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-23T00:00:00","slug":"blair-contre-lattaque-de-liran","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/23\/blair-contre-lattaque-de-liran\/","title":{"rendered":"Blair contre l’attaque de l’Iran"},"content":{"rendered":"

D\u00e9cid\u00e9ment, il y a beaucoup de diff\u00e9rences entre la p\u00e9riode de l’avant-guerre de la guerre d’Irak, en 2002-2003, et cette p\u00e9riode qu’on pourrait croire \u00e0 certains moments celle de l’avant-guerre d’une tr\u00e8s prochaine guerre d’Iran. Il y a aujourd’hui cet \u00e9l\u00e9ment important : pour la premi\u00e8re fois, Tony Blair se prononce sans ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 contre une attaque.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl s’agit d’une rupture importante de ce qui \u00e9tait le front agressif anti-irakien de 2002-2003, et encore, dans la mesure o\u00f9 l’on tient pour acquis que le gouvernement US peut \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme voulant conduire une telle attaque. La prise de position de Blair est un \u00e9v\u00e9nement important dans la crise iranienne. C’est peut-\u00eatre une indication que les Britanniques jugent les divers bruits d’attaque inqui\u00e9tants et qu’ils entendent freiner ou renverser la perception de l’in\u00e9vitabilit\u00e9 d’une attaque.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAinsi le Times<\/em> d’aujourd’hui<\/a> nous parle-t-il de Blair et de la position britannique, o\u00f9 l’on voit que les divergences UK-USA ne manquent pas :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abBut Mr Blair, in a BBC interview yesterday, said: I can’t think that it would be right to take military action against Iran . . . What is important is to pursue the political, diplomatic channel. I think it is the only way that we are going to get a sensible solution to the Iranian issue.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe diplomatic options will be on the table on Monday when representatives of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and Germany meet in London to begin drafting a new resolution.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIt was notable that Mr Blair’s remarks yesterday closely resembled those of Jack Straw last year, who said that an attack on Iran was inconceivable, angering Washington and perhaps contributing to his removal as Foreign Secretary.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe Prime Minister’s comments reflect what British officials have been saying privately for some time, but also show a growing streak of independence from Mr Bush. The White House was unhappy with the timing of Mr Blair’s announcement this week on withdrawing 1,600 British troops, concerned that it undercut Mr Bush’s efforts to shore up support for his troop surge on Capitol Hill while sending out mixed messages to the Iranians.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBritain has also privately expressed concern over the handling of the US military briefing last week which alleged that the highest levels of the Iranian Government were behind the supply of weapons to Iraqi militias.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 23 f\u00e9vrier 2007 \u00e0 08H35<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

D\u00e9cid\u00e9ment, il y a beaucoup de diff\u00e9rences entre la p\u00e9riode de l’avant-guerre de la guerre d’Irak, en 2002-2003, et cette p\u00e9riode qu’on pourrait croire \u00e0 certains moments celle de l’avant-guerre d’une tr\u00e8s prochaine guerre d’Iran. Il y a aujourd’hui cet \u00e9l\u00e9ment important : pour la premi\u00e8re fois, Tony Blair se prononce sans ambigu\u00eft\u00e9 contre une… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2870,705,2773,6196],"class_list":["post-68557","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-attaque","tag-blair","tag-iran","tag-uk-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68557","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68557"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68557\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68557"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68557"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68557"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}