{"id":68562,"date":"2007-02-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-02-24T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/24\/crise-climatique-les-republicains-restent-tres-sceptiques-en-songeant-aux-flatulences-des-dinosaures\/"},"modified":"2007-02-24T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-02-24T00:00:00","slug":"crise-climatique-les-republicains-restent-tres-sceptiques-en-songeant-aux-flatulences-des-dinosaures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/02\/24\/crise-climatique-les-republicains-restent-tres-sceptiques-en-songeant-aux-flatulences-des-dinosaures\/","title":{"rendered":"Crise climatique : les r\u00e9publicains restent tr\u00e8s sceptiques en songeant aux \u201cflatulences des dinosaures\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Depuis l&rsquo;arriv\u00e9e des d\u00e9mocrates \u00e0 la t\u00eate du Congr\u00e8s US le 7 novembre dernier, et depuis divers \u00e9v\u00e9nements comme <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3300\" class=\"gen\">le rapport Stern<\/a>, la question de la crise climatique semble avoir franchi un nouveau pas : cette crise \u00e9tant admise, comment lutter contre elle? Il semble que, pour les r\u00e9publicains au Congr\u00e8s, ce ne soit pas compl\u00e8tement le cas.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;int\u00e9r\u00eat du texte de Richard Monastersky et Jeffrey Brainard, sur <em>ConsortiumNews.com<\/em> ce <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consortiumnews.com\/2007\/022107b.html\" class=\"gen\">22 f\u00e9vrier<\/a>, c&rsquo;est de nous montrer combien cette question reste tr\u00e8s pol\u00e9mique, combien elle est hautement politis\u00e9e, combien nombre de parlementaires r\u00e9publicains restent tr\u00e8s hostiles \u00e0 la pouss\u00e9e actuelle de lutte contre la crise, voire sceptiques \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9gard du fait de la crise elle-m\u00eame ou de la place de l&rsquo;action humaine dans cette crise.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe texte concerne une audition semble-t-il m\u00e9morable, \u00e0 la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants le 8 f\u00e9vrier dernier. On y entend le d\u00e9put\u00e9 W. Todd Akin, un r\u00e9publicain du Missouri, demander : \u00ab<em>Is it so bad if it gets warmer?<\/em>\u00bb ; ou bien le r\u00e9publicain Dana Rohrabacher (ancien <em>speechwriter<\/em> de Reagan) de Californie \u00e9voquer les p\u00e9riodes anciennes de changement climatique et sugg\u00e9rant que certaines d&rsquo;entre elles ont pu \u00eatre largement influenc\u00e9es \u00ab<em>by dinosaur flatulence<\/em>\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCe texte montre combien l&rsquo;opposition id\u00e9ologique, la distorsion partisane et l&rsquo;absence compl\u00e8te de culture civique autant que scientifique, le m\u00e9pris du bon sens marquent le d\u00e9bat politique \u00e0 Washington. Il est introduit de cette fa\u00e7on par l&rsquo;\u00e9diteur du site :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>After the Nov. 7 elections, many observers believed Republicans would moderate some controversial positions, from the Iraq War to their resistance to the science on global warming. But one of the surprises of the past few months is how many Republicans  from President George W. Bush to leaders of the new congressional minority  have stuck to their guns and dug in their heels.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>In this guest essay, Richard Monastersky and Jeffrey Brainard look at the hostile reaction that global warming scientists got from key House Republicans during a hearing in February<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>When Congress starts discussing the climatic effects of dinosaur farts, it treads on dangerous territory, given members&rsquo; own reputations for producing hot air. But Rep. Dana Rohrabacher of California bravely ventured into that sensitive subject on Feb. 8, during a heated hearing on global warming in the House Committee on Science and Technology.<\/em>  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>In the three-hour session, members quizzed four scientists who had helped oversee a report issued by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, better known as the IPCC.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>While much of the hearing centered on technical aspects of climate science, the session produced some dramatic scenes of political theater, including a rare appearance by the speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi of California, before the committee.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The fireworks underscored how politically charged the issue of climate change remains, even as several formerly skeptical members of Congress said they were now convinced that the problem is real.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 24 f\u00e9vrier 2007 \u00e0 05H37<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Depuis l&rsquo;arriv\u00e9e des d\u00e9mocrates \u00e0 la t\u00eate du Congr\u00e8s US le 7 novembre dernier, et depuis divers \u00e9v\u00e9nements comme le rapport Stern, la question de la crise climatique semble avoir franchi un nouveau pas : cette crise \u00e9tant admise, comment lutter contre elle? Il semble que, pour les r\u00e9publicains au Congr\u00e8s, ce ne soit pas&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3359,3392,3228,5310,6471],"class_list":["post-68562","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-chambre","tag-climatique","tag-crise","tag-republicains","tag-sceptiques"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68562","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68562"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68562\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68562"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68562"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68562"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}