But what goes up must come down. In the first term, Cheney was styled as the most influential vice president in history in more lurid versions, an evil puppeteer pulling George W. Bush’s strings. So now his irascibility in television interviews triggers diplomatic cables analyzing his equilibrium as well as inspiring a booming industry of scathing cartoons and television one-liners here at home.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tHoagland encha\u00eene alors sur ce qu’il affirme \u00eatre des perspectives nouvelles et exceptionnelles pour la diplomatie au Moyen-Orient. Changement complet de programme, en connexion directe avec la r\u00e9union qui a eu lieu aujourd’hui \u00e0 Bagdad, avec Rice comme nouvelle \u00e9toile affirm\u00e9e de la n\u00e9o-diplomatie US.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00abAnd it is not over. Reports of a new defeat lie ahead for the hard line on Iran and Syria that is associated with Cheney’s office if this week’s meeting of ambassadors in Baghdad produces progress on Iraqi stability. Diplomats tell me that Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has persuaded Turkey to host a ministerial conference next month that will include Iraq’s neighbors, the permanent members of the U.N. Security Council and the Group of Eight nations, and that she will attend.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbRice is credited by administration sources with having told Bush in January that he should devote his final two years in office to seeking diplomatic agreements with North Korea and Iran and an Israeli-Palestinian peace accord. That account emphasizes that Rice is not simply outflanking Cheney in intermittent internal policy battles but has won full agreement and support from the president on the strategic goals and methods she and her diplomats are pursuing. <\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tPrudent car il ne fait pas moins qu’\u00e9voquer ainsi une perspective peuplant les r\u00eaves des hommes les plus influents de l’establishment<\/em>, ceux qui esp\u00e8rent fi\u00e9vreusement un retour \u00e0 la normale de la politique ext\u00e9rieure US, Hoagland termine : \u00abThis remains to be confirmed by events<\/em>\u00bb Nous ferons n\u00f4tre cette sage maxime, tant la fin du r\u00e8gne de l’extr\u00e9misme \u00e0 Washington ne cesse d’\u00eatre annonc\u00e9 r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement depuis trois ans et plus, sans la moindre r\u00e9alisation sur le fond m\u00eame si l’apparat est parfois chang\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 10 mars 2007 \u00e0 23H44<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Jim Hoagland, vieux briscard du commentaire plus ou moins officiel \u00e0 Washington, soul\u00e8ve ce qui est devenu aujourd’hui quelque chose comme un myst\u00e8re Dick Cheney, qui concerne la position actuelle du vice-pr\u00e9sident. Dans sa chronique du 7 mars du Washington Post, Hoagland affirme que l’influence de Cheney est en forte baisse, que le vice-pr\u00e9sident est… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1294,2628,3307,857,3306],"class_list":["post-68608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cheney","tag-diplomatie","tag-hoagland","tag-irak","tag-rice"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68608"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68608\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}