Hagel is in Nebraska this morning announcing that he will not announce his candidacy for either the presidency, another senate term, or even retirement from public life until the fall of this year. But he is sending signals big ones that he’s going to be a player’ in nearly every significant domestic and international policy issue that confronts America at this pivotal point in its national history.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tEn d’autres termes, Hagel a annonc\u00e9 sa d\u00e9cision de donner du temps au temps. Il va humer l’air du temps. Il va mesurer les soutiens dont il peut disposer. Eventuellement, il va cr\u00e9er un suspens de plus dans la campagne, \u00e9tendre son ombre sur les autres candidats, ou bien dispara\u00eetre et devenir un autre Delors-1995, s’il s’av\u00e8re qu’il n’a pas obtenu ce qu’il attendait.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tC’est une tactique certes, mais c’est une tactique risqu\u00e9e, certes, mais l’on dira que toute tactique est risqu\u00e9e, certes Et ainsi de suite.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tOn ne se prononcera pas sur la d\u00e9cision de la campagne en forme de non-campagne de Hagel ou sa d\u00e9cision tonitruante de ne rien d\u00e9cider encore. On fera l’hypoth\u00e8se qu’il s’agit d’un signe de plus de l’incertitude et de la volatilit\u00e9 de la situation politique aux USA. Ce n’est pas une hypoth\u00e8se tr\u00e8s risqu\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 13 mars 2007 \u00e0 09H00<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Nous voil\u00e0 pris. Ayant \u00e9voqu\u00e9, avec une subtilit\u00e9 que nous esp\u00e9rions habile, les deux d\u00e9cisions possibles (candidat, pas candidat?) du s\u00e9nateur r\u00e9publicain Chuck Hagel, dans notre texte d’hier r\u00e9dig\u00e9 avant l’\u00e9v\u00e9nement de sa conf\u00e9rence de presse, nous voil\u00e0 plac\u00e9s devant une troisi\u00e8me. Bravo, Chuk Hagel. Allez donc sur le site de Steve C. Clemons, ce… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6120,6179,6510,4841,3340],"class_list":["post-68617","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-campagne","tag-clemons","tag-decision","tag-hagel","tag-presidentielles"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68617","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68617"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68617\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68617"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68617"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68617"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}