{"id":68618,"date":"2007-03-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-03-13T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/03\/13\/lotan-et-les-anti-missiles-pas-a-laise-du-tout\/"},"modified":"2007-03-13T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-03-13T00:00:00","slug":"lotan-et-les-anti-missiles-pas-a-laise-du-tout","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/03\/13\/lotan-et-les-anti-missiles-pas-a-laise-du-tout\/","title":{"rendered":"L&rsquo;OTAN et les anti-missiles : pas \u00e0 l&rsquo;aise du tout"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Apr\u00e8s l&rsquo;UE, l&rsquo;OTAN est  elle-m\u00eame touch\u00e9e par la fi\u00e8vre des anti-missiles US (BMD). Cela est rapport\u00e9 par Daniel Dombey, dans le <em>Financial Times<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/c9cf7d6a-d008-11db-94cb-000b5df10621.html\" class=\"gen\">12 mars<\/a>, qui nous informe d&rsquo;une d\u00e9claration l\u00e9g\u00e8rement inqui\u00e8te du secr\u00e9taire g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de l&rsquo;OTAN.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, Nato secretary general, has warned that the alliance risks being split between countries that would be covered by the US&rsquo;s proposed missile defence programme and other member states left exposed to missile threats from Iran.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Nato officials say the US programme would protect almost all of Europe, but not the southeast, which would need an extra, shorter range system because of the closeness to Iran.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>When it comes to missile defence, there shouldn&rsquo;t be an A-league and a B-league within Nato, Mr de Hoop Scheffer said in an interview with the Financial Times. For me it is indivisibility of security that is the guiding principle.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The Nato chief&rsquo;s comments open a new front in the debate about the US&rsquo;s plans for missile defence, which has been dominated by Russia&rsquo;s objections to the Bush administration&rsquo;s request to install bases in Poland and the Czech Republic.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tComme dit Dombey, il s&rsquo;agit bien d&rsquo;un nouveau front dans la pol\u00e9mique des BMD en Europe. Mais il semble, d&rsquo;apr\u00e8s ce qu&rsquo;on comprend, que la chose est consid\u00e9r\u00e9e d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on diff\u00e9rente de ce qu&rsquo;on a vu \u00e0 l&rsquo;UE. Cette fois, l&rsquo;argument n&rsquo;est pas la crainte d&rsquo;une nouvelle division de l&rsquo;Europe \u00e0 cause de l&rsquo;implantation des BDM mais d&rsquo;une division de l&rsquo;OTAN parce que les BDM ne couvrent pas tous les territoires de l&rsquo;Alliance.  C&rsquo;est ajouter une autre sorte de complication \u00e0 la complication existante, et allant dans le sens inverse (la solution serait en effet que d&rsquo;<strong>autres<\/strong> bases BDM soient envisag\u00e9es, en plus de celles qui le sont).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 13 mars 2007 \u00e0 10H52<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Apr\u00e8s l&rsquo;UE, l&rsquo;OTAN est elle-m\u00eame touch\u00e9e par la fi\u00e8vre des anti-missiles US (BMD). Cela est rapport\u00e9 par Daniel Dombey, dans le Financial Times du 12 mars, qui nous informe d&rsquo;une d\u00e9claration l\u00e9g\u00e8rement inqui\u00e8te du secr\u00e9taire g\u00e9n\u00e9ral de l&rsquo;OTAN. \u00abJaap de Hoop Scheffer, Nato secretary general, has warned that the alliance risks being split between countries&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3453,6496,6511,6512,2851,584,2852,2609],"class_list":["post-68618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-anti-missiles","tag-bdm","tag-dombey","tag-euromissies-ii","tag-financial","tag-otan","tag-times","tag-ue"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68618"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68618\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}