RAW Story<\/a> rapporte cette intervention de Clinton dans des termes r\u00e9sum\u00e9s, mais les d\u00e9veloppements n’ont ici gu\u00e8re d’utilit\u00e9. C’est le principe de cette prise de position qui importe.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abSenator Hillary Rodham Clinton foresees a remaining military as well as political mission in Iraq, and says that if elected president, she would keep a reduced but significant military force there to fight Al Qaeda, deter Iranian aggression, protect the Kurds and possibly support the Iraqi military, reports the New York Times.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbClinton said a scaled-down American military force would stay in Iraq but off the streets of Baghdad. The force would also not get involved in sectarian violence even if it descended into ethnic cleansing, writes Michael Gordon and Patrick Healy.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tDans le texte du New York Times<\/em>, Clinton r\u00e9sume son argument : \u00abThe United States’ security would be undermined if parts of Iraq turned into a failed state that serves as a petri dish for insurgents and Al Qaeda, she said. It is right in the heart of the oil region. It is directly in opposition to our interests, to the interests of regimes, to Israel’s interests.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLa messe est dite. L’argument est totalement conforme \u00e0 l’imp\u00e9rialisme et au bellicisme am\u00e9ricanistes. Hillary Clinton sera une candidate parfaitement conforme aux int\u00e9r\u00eats am\u00e9ricanistes et, finalement, dans la droite ligne de GW Bush. Sa prise de position impliquerait tout au plus une critique de la forme de l’engagement US, de l’implication des forces US dans les tueries d\u00e9clench\u00e9es par l’intervention US. (Bien s\u00fbr, il y a loin de la coupe aux l\u00e8vres : la maladresse et l’inefficacit\u00e9 \u00e9tant la marque universelle du syst\u00e8me, ces bonnes intentions ne seraient suivies d’aucun effet : m\u00eame si les forces US restaient en Irak selon les consignes d’Hillary, elles seraient impliqu\u00e9es dans les batailles irakiennes parce qu’on se chargerait de les y impliquer, et qu’elles riposteraient d’une mani\u00e8re inepte qui les y impliquerait encore plus.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tClinton marque et confirme d’une fa\u00e7on convaincante combien le lib\u00e9ralisme humaniste, embrassant aussi bien une bonne partie de la droite qu’une grosse partie de la gauche, est aujourd’hui la force destructrice et belliciste par excellence. Sa position est dans la plus compl\u00e8te logique de l’attaque US contre le Kosovo en mars 1999, voulue par l’administration Clinton, o\u00f9 cette m\u00eame Hillary joua un r\u00f4le de faucon pr\u00e9monitoire (elle poussa son mari \u00e0 renforcer les bombardements). Hillary sera donc la candidate favorite des intellectuels lib\u00e9raux qui, de New York \u00e0 Paris, ont applaudi \u00e0 la guerre contre le Kosovo, et qui, finalement, ne regrettent qu’une chose avec l’Irak, c’est que les bombes y fassent trop de bruit audible<\/strong> et le sang trop de taches visibles<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 15 mars 2007 \u00e0 06H33<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Apr\u00e8s des semaines de tergiversations pour d\u00e9cider ou ne pas d\u00e9cider si elle devait s’excuser pour son vote en faveur de la guerre en Irak (en 2002), ou pour \u00e9viter les questions \u00e0 ce propos, Hillary Clinton a r\u00e9pondu d’une certaine fa\u00e7on, ou plut\u00f4t non, elle a r\u00e9pondu d’une fa\u00e7on certaine. Elle s’est confi\u00e9e au… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3278,6519,857,3085,5905],"class_list":["post-68624","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-hillary","tag-humaniste","tag-irak","tag-kosovo","tag-liberaux"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68624","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68624"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68624\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68624"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68624"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68624"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}