{"id":68636,"date":"2007-03-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-03-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/03\/18\/euromissiles-ii-la-pologne-et-des-bruits-discordants\/"},"modified":"2007-03-18T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-03-18T00:00:00","slug":"euromissiles-ii-la-pologne-et-des-bruits-discordants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/03\/18\/euromissiles-ii-la-pologne-et-des-bruits-discordants\/","title":{"rendered":"Euromissiles-II, la Pologne et des bruits discordants"},"content":{"rendered":"

Deux textes nous donnent une approche bien diff\u00e9rente de la vision habituelle de la situation en Pologne (principalement) et autour de la question des anti-missiles US (le syst\u00e8me BMD).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t Un article du Los Angeles Times<\/em> du 16 mars<\/a> d\u00e9crit une Pologne h\u00e9sitante jusque dans ses \u00e9lites les plus habitu\u00e9es \u00e0 nous montrer un visage tr\u00e8s pro-am\u00e9ricaniste.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abPoland has been a steadfast friend to the United States, sending troops to Iraq and Afghanistan and emerging as one of the few pro-American voices in Europe. But interviews with Polish officials suggest that Warsaw is skeptical about the idea of playing host to a missile defense shield to protect the U.S. from possible strikes by Iran and North Korea.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t() <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe debate comes as Poles have grown disillusioned over the Iraq war and with Bush administration policies that many believe have isolated the U.S. and its allies. Poland is maturing as a nation and is less effusive these days about an America it had idealized for decades from the other side of the Berlin Wall, politicians and analysts say.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe coalition government of Prime Minister Jaroslaw Kaczynski has said it probably would accept the U.S. proposal, although many officials in Warsaw and in other European capitals would prefer a wider system integrated with North Atlantic Treaty Organization defense plans. Washington also is asking Britain to house interceptor rockets, and European officials are concerned about angering Russia and touching off another arms race on the continent.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbWe’re open to an antimissile shield, but it must have a real impact on the protection of our own country, said Jedrzej Jedrych, a member of Parliament’s national defense committee. Installation of this system would make us a target not only for our neighbors, but also for terrorist organizations. We’d have to increase our security and ask for the U.S. to help us speed up the modernization of our military.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t On doit aussi signaler un article du Nouvel Observateur<\/em> du 15 mars<\/a>, de Vincent Jauvert, qui met en \u00e9vidence \u00e9galement les r\u00e9sistances grandissantes dans les pays d’Europe de l’Est, principalement ceux qui sont concern\u00e9s par les pressions US. Dans l’extrait ci-dessous, on retrouve un avis s\u00e9v\u00e8re de Sikorski, le ministre polonais de la d\u00e9fense d\u00e9missionnaire, dont les liens avec les n\u00e9o-conservateurs US puissants sont rappel\u00e9s, sans aucune explication pour ce qui concerne son \u00e9volution extr\u00eamement caract\u00e9ristique, extr\u00eamement critique des Am\u00e9ricains.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abMais, \u00e0 Varsovie comme \u00e0 Prague, cette foi absolue, na\u00efve, dans le grand fr\u00e8re am\u00e9ricain s’\u00e9mousse. M\u00eame chez les plus ardents d\u00e9fenseurs du lien transatlantique. M\u00eame chez Radoslaw Sikorski. Ministre de la D\u00e9fense polonais il y a un mois encore, ce quadrag\u00e9naire est un intime de l’\u00e9quipe Bush. Il a travaill\u00e9 pendant plusieurs ann\u00e9es \u00e0 Washington dans le think tank n\u00e9oconservateur le plus influent, American Enterprise Institute. Pourtant, il dit aujourd’hui : Il y a cinq ans, nous aurions pu signer les yeux ferm\u00e9s parce que nous avions une confiance totale dans les Etats-Unis. Mais il y a eu la guerre en Irak. Nous y avons envoy\u00e9 des troupes, mais nous n’avons pas obtenu en \u00e9change ce que nous attendions, et puis ce ne fut pas vraiment un succ\u00e8s… Alors nous avons d\u00e9cid\u00e9 que l’Am\u00e9rique \u00e9tait un pays \u00e9tranger avec lequel il fallait n\u00e9gocier. Parce que ce serait \u00e0 nous de supporter les plus grands risques. Si on installe les dix intercepteurs en Pom\u00e9ranie, le Kremlin fera probablement ce qu’il dit : d\u00e9placer des missiles \u00e0 notre fronti\u00e8re pour menacer Varsovie. En \u00e9change de notre soutien, les Am\u00e9ricains devraient donc nous proposer des mesures pour renforcer notre s\u00e9curit\u00e9, comme celles qu’ils ont offertes au Japon : une alliance bilat\u00e9rale et des batteries antimissiles PAC-3. Ainsi le r\u00e9sultat des discussions en cours est loin d’\u00eatre \u00e9vident : cette fois, notre Parlement pourrait bien dire non.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 18 mars 2007 \u00e0 14H19<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Deux textes nous donnent une approche bien diff\u00e9rente de la vision habituelle de la situation en Pologne (principalement) et autour de la question des anti-missiles US (le syst\u00e8me BMD). Un article du Los Angeles Times du 16 mars d\u00e9crit une Pologne h\u00e9sitante jusque dans ses \u00e9lites les plus habitu\u00e9es \u00e0 nous montrer un visage tr\u00e8s… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5433,6484,2827,4862,5551,2804],"class_list":["post-68636","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bmd","tag-euromissiles-ii","tag-pologne","tag-sikorski","tag-tchequie","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68636","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68636"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68636\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68636"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68636"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68636"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}