{"id":68646,"date":"2007-03-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-03-22T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/03\/22\/le-systeme-contre-le-climat-open-skies\/"},"modified":"2007-03-22T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-03-22T00:00:00","slug":"le-systeme-contre-le-climat-open-skies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/03\/22\/le-systeme-contre-le-climat-open-skies\/","title":{"rendered":"Le syst\u00e8me contre le climat : \u201c<em>Open Skies<\/em>\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Vous avez entendu parler de<em>Open Skies<\/em>. L&rsquo;accord devrait \u00eatre sign\u00e9 entre l&rsquo;UE et les US, aujourd&rsquo;hui. Les signataires et partisans de la signature,  bureaucrates, \u00e9conomistes, commentateurs, tous dans la ligne,  saluent avec une jubilation extr\u00eame cet accord qui r\u00e9volutionne le transport a\u00e9rien. En gros, il ouvre les routes du ciel \u00e0 toutes les compagnies, dans des espaces a\u00e9riens \u00e0 grand trafic et jusqu&rsquo;alors prot\u00e9g\u00e9s. L&rsquo;UE, exultante, nous explique la chose, par l&rsquo;interm\u00e9diaire de <em>The Independent<\/em> qui publie <a href=\"http:\/\/news.independent.co.uk\/environment\/climate_change\/article2381060.ece\" class=\"gen\">un article<\/a> sur l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement aujourd&rsquo;hui :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>According to the European Commission, the plan will create 72,000 jobs on both sides of the Atlantic. Over a period of five years 26 million additional passengers would fly across the Atlantic. By the fifth year the market would have grown by a third creating 9.6 million more travellers.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes d\u00e9fenseurs de l&rsquo;environnement et guerriers de la crise climatique r\u00e9pondent aussit\u00f4t : l&rsquo;accord va aggraver consid\u00e9rablement la pollution, par cons\u00e9quent le r\u00e9chauffement climatique et ainsi de suite. L\u00e0 aussi, l&rsquo;argument est consid\u00e9rable et p\u00e9remptoire. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The European Federation for Transport and the Environment pressure group said that, based on the Commission calculations, This will lead to some 3.5 million tonnes of extra CO2 emissions annually. This is about as much as the expected reduction of aviation emissions resulting from the inclusion of aviation into the European emissions trading system. It also argued that the deal makes it difficult to change the current system under which kerosene is exempt from taxation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Caroline Lucas, a Green MEP, argued: This Open Skies&rsquo; agreement risks undermining all the EU&rsquo;s effort on tackling climate change, and must be rejected  at least until both the EU and US have adopted a tough package of measures to reduce the sector&rsquo;s emissions year-on-year, such as establishing an aviation-only emissions trading scheme with fixed, annually reducing emissions caps.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>It is simply incompatible to be encouraging a large increase in the number of flights between the EU and US and cutting greenhouse gas emissions sufficiently to either prevent the worst impacts of climate change, or even meet the emissions reductions targets agreed at the Brussels summit this month.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEt ainsi vont les arguments des uns et des autres, avec la Commission europ\u00e9enne comme bon exemple : championne du syst\u00e8me, de la lib\u00e9ralisation \u00e9conomique, de la croissance maximale, de l&rsquo;acc\u00e9l\u00e9ration acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9e de l&rsquo;activit\u00e9 \u00e9conomique, etc.  championne de la lutte contre la crise climatique, des restrictions d&rsquo;\u00e9missions de gaz, de la pollution, etc. Comment concilier cet etc et cet etc ? Pas de r\u00e9ponse. Comment ne pas penser \u00e0 l&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3828\" class=\"gen\">obsession<\/a> am\u00e9ricaniste pour la d\u00e9fense du syst\u00e8me ? Comment ne pas penser \u00e0 l&rsquo;argumentation d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3521\" class=\"gen\">Anatol Lieven<\/a>, au constat qu&rsquo;il y a quelque chose d&rsquo;in\u00e9luctable dans cette confrontation <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=1014\" class=\"gen\">au cur<\/a> de notre civilisation ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 22 mars 2007 \u00e0 04H46<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Vous avez entendu parler deOpen Skies. L&rsquo;accord devrait \u00eatre sign\u00e9 entre l&rsquo;UE et les US, aujourd&rsquo;hui. Les signataires et partisans de la signature, bureaucrates, \u00e9conomistes, commentateurs, tous dans la ligne, saluent avec une jubilation extr\u00eame cet accord qui r\u00e9volutionne le transport a\u00e9rien. En gros, il ouvre les routes du ciel \u00e0 toutes les compagnies, dans&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3392,3228,4049,6534,6535,3014,2609,2804],"class_list":["post-68646","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-climatique","tag-crise","tag-lieven","tag-open","tag-skies","tag-systeme","tag-ue","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68646"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68646\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68646"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}