{"id":68665,"date":"2007-03-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-03-28T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/03\/28\/le-congres-et-les-anti-missiles-les-europeens-aux-petits-oignons\/"},"modified":"2007-03-28T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-03-28T00:00:00","slug":"le-congres-et-les-anti-missiles-les-europeens-aux-petits-oignons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/03\/28\/le-congres-et-les-anti-missiles-les-europeens-aux-petits-oignons\/","title":{"rendered":"Le Congr\u00e8s et les anti-missiles : les Europ\u00e9ens aux petits oignons"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Ce n&rsquo;est pas pour \u00e7a qu&rsquo;on ne s&rsquo;occupe plus des anti-missiles (BMD, ou Ballistic Missile Defense) Pendant que vous vous pr\u00e9parez aux vacances de P\u00e2ques, le Congr\u00e8s poursuit ses auditions et quelques officiels du Pentagone charg\u00e9s d&rsquo;ors et d&rsquo;id\u00e9es originales viennent notamment parler de leurs projets pour l&rsquo;Europe. Ici (le 26 mars), dans le rapport qu&rsquo;en fait <a href=\"http:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/story.php?F=2654139&#038;C=americas\" class=\"gen\">Kris Osborn<\/a> dans <em>Defense News<\/em>, il s&rsquo;agit notamment de Brian Green, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategic Capabilities, et du g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Obering, directeur de la Defense Missile Agency (DMA).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tExtraits :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Green testified that pending negotiations with Polish and Czech officials would pave the way forward.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>There are a series of negotiations which we must go through. We have to persuade Congress that this is a good idea. We will pursue this in a NATO context, said Green.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Rep. Ellen O. Tauscher, D- Calif., subcommittee chairwoman, said she wanted to see more NATO involvement in the decision to put silos in Poland.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>We do have interoperability. It is tough to get 26 [NATO] members, I understand that. But that is what we want to be doing. I would feel better if this were a NATO framework we were operating in, said Tauscher.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>An additional incentive for the European missile defenses is the large presence of U.S. forces in Europe. Part of the idea to extend is because we have a big number of deployed forces in Europe. A third site would provide protection for them as well, said Obering.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tVoici donc les nouvelles,  ou, disons l&rsquo;orientation des choses :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  On ne veut pas s&rsquo;en tenir aux seuls deux Polonais et Tch\u00e8ques. Il y aura d&rsquo;autres heureux \u00e9lus.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  L&rsquo;argument de d\u00e9part s&rsquo;\u00e9largit. Il s&rsquo;agit certes de contrer les pullulants missiles iraniens et nord-cor\u00e9ens, mais aussi de prot\u00e9ger les h\u00e9ro\u00efques G.I.&rsquo;s stationn\u00e9s en Europe,  notamment en Allemagne, tiens  (Demandera-t-on bient\u00f4t aux Allemands d&rsquo;avoir leur base d&rsquo;anti-missiles US ?)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  Les parlementaires US seraient plus \u00e0 l&rsquo;aise si tout cela \u00e9tait estampill\u00e9 OTAN, de fa\u00e7on \u00e0 ce que tout le monde soit solidaire. Eventuellement, de fa\u00e7on \u00e0 ce que tout le monde mette la main au porte-monnaie, puisqu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;un projet OTAN qui prot\u00e8ge l&rsquo;Europe enti\u00e8rement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDemandez le programme<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 28 mars 2007 \u00e0 15H53<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ce n&rsquo;est pas pour \u00e7a qu&rsquo;on ne s&rsquo;occupe plus des anti-missiles (BMD, ou Ballistic Missile Defense) Pendant que vous vous pr\u00e9parez aux vacances de P\u00e2ques, le Congr\u00e8s poursuit ses auditions et quelques officiels du Pentagone charg\u00e9s d&rsquo;ors et d&rsquo;id\u00e9es originales viennent notamment parler de leurs projets pour l&rsquo;Europe. Ici (le 26 mars), dans le rapport&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3453,6496,3285,6484,398,6485,584,2827],"class_list":["post-68665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-anti-missiles","tag-bdm","tag-congres","tag-euromissiles-ii","tag-europe","tag-obering","tag-otan","tag-pologne"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68665"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68665\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}