{"id":68677,"date":"2007-04-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-04-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/04\/01\/rule-the-waves-britannia-bof\/"},"modified":"2007-04-01T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-04-01T00:00:00","slug":"rule-the-waves-britannia-bof","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/04\/01\/rule-the-waves-britannia-bof\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cRule the Waves, Britannia<\/em>\u201d ? Bof\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

Il est toujours possible que la th\u00e8se des complotistes soit fond\u00e9e et que la capture des 15 Britanniques ne soit que la pr\u00e9paration d’un casus belli<\/em> pour attaquer<\/a> l’Iran. En attendant, les signes qui nous sont disponibles, \u00e0 nous pauvres p\u00eacheurs en eaux territoriales, ne sont pas exaltants. Il s’agirait plut\u00f4t du Royaume-Uni pris au pi\u00e8ge d’une situation particuli\u00e8rement d\u00e9licate. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe Sunday Telegraph<\/em> rend compte, sur un ton professionnel qui doit cacher une fureur consid\u00e9rable, d’une situation d’impasse pour Londres, et de la recherche d\u00e9sesp\u00e9r\u00e9e d’un accord avec les Iraniens. Le quotidien, qui a de bonnes sources dans la bureaucratie militaire, signale une proposition qu’envisageraient les Britanniques, qui n’est pas vraiment glorieuse pour l’ex-puissante Angleterre imp\u00e9riale et son ex-imp\u00e9riale Royal Navy : le Royaume-Uni s’engagerait solennellement \u00e0 ne pas p\u00e9n\u00e9trer intentionnellement dans les eaux territoriales iraniennes. C’est un curieux engagement puisqu’il ne s’agit que du respect des lois internationales en la mati\u00e8re, mais dans les circonstances courantes et le contexte, cela revient presque \u00e0 un aveu des Britanniques qu’ils ont d\u00e9j\u00e0 viol\u00e9 intentionnellement les eaux territoriales iraniennes, et, pourquoi pas, avec les 15 marins et Marines<\/em> captur\u00e9s par T\u00e9h\u00e9ran ?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici quelques mots de cet article<\/a> du Sunday Telegraph<\/em> d’aujourd’hui :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abMinisters are preparing a compromise deal to allow Iran to save face and release its 15 British military captives by promising that the Royal Navy will never knowingly enter Iranian waters without permission.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe Sunday Telegraph has learnt of plans to send a Royal Navy captain or commodore to Teheran, as a special envoy of the Government, to deliver a public assurance that officials hope will end the diplomatic standoff.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe move, which was discussed at a meeting of Whitehall’s Cobra crisis committee yesterday, came as Downing Street officials explicitly cautioned against hopes of a speedy outcome and said that families of the hostages should prepare for the long haul.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe Prime Minister, Tony Blair, and the Foreign Secretary, Margaret Beckett, have been warned that the impasse may develop into a long-term stand-off. Privately, officials are speculating that the crisis could continue for months.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbThe renewed search for a solution was given greater urgency when a senior Iranian official said that moves had begun to put the 15 British captives on trial.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 1er avril 2007 \u00e0 11H42<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Il est toujours possible que la th\u00e8se des complotistes soit fond\u00e9e et que la capture des 15 Britanniques ne soit que la pr\u00e9paration d’un casus belli pour attaquer l’Iran. En attendant, les signes qui nous sont disponibles, \u00e0 nous pauvres p\u00eacheurs en eaux territoriales, ne sont pas exaltants. Il s’agirait plut\u00f4t du Royaume-Uni pris au… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2773,2680,6551,3319,6559,4214],"class_list":["post-68677","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-iran","tag-londres","tag-marins","tag-navy","tag-otages","tag-royal"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68677","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68677"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68677\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}