avec les buts qu’il affiche<\/strong>, n’a de sens que s’il englobe la Russie pour des raisons techniques, strat\u00e9giques et g\u00e9ographiques. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tAu-del\u00e0, l’article de Kosachev a un int\u00e9r\u00eat certain en ce sens qu’il explicite de fa\u00e7on plus pr\u00e9cise qu’il n’a \u00e9t\u00e9 fait jusqu’ici un point essentiel. Outre l’opposition qu’on peut \u00e9ventuellement montrer au syst\u00e8me US, il existe \u00e9galement une possibilit\u00e9 alternative. En d’autres termes, le Russe dit aux Europ\u00e9ens : si vous estimez qu’il faut un syst\u00e8me de cette sorte, alors faisons un syst\u00e8me Europe-Russie.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tCet article fixe bien les enjeux de cette crise, \u00e9videmment ignor\u00e9e du grand public et des m\u00e9dias autoris\u00e9s.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00bbAs for the military aspects of the missile defense plans, we have not tired of pointing out that the system is useless against missiles from Iran or North Korea for the simple reason that these countries do not possess such long-range arsenals and even the most dictatorial regime would not think of firing a rocket across Europe at the United States.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbAs far as Russia is concerned, it will find an asymmetrical response capable of overcoming the antimissile defenses. This is an appeal, first of all, to the Europeans who are directly affected by this, and also to the American taxpayers, whose cash will be poured into expensive and pointless schemes.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbBut this is not the main thing. Even if one were to imagine hypothetically that North Korean missiles might one day be fired at targets in Europe, one doesn’t have to be an expert in geography to realize that the greater part of their trajectory would be over Russia. Does anyone suppose that Russians want nuclear warheads flying over their heads particularly carried by missiles of dubious quality?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbRussia has every reason to be interested in close cooperation in creating Eurasian missile-defense systems. And any attempt to build them without Russia (which is not only an interested party but also geographically and technically the most suitable place for an effective antimissile defense) automatically means they are being built against Russia.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe news that the United States may want to extend the antimissile arc to Ukraine and Georgia (and so on around Russia’s perimeter) merely confirms the true object of America’s missile-defense system in Eurasia.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 7 avril 2007 \u00e0 19H36<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
C’est un article plein de bonnes vieilles v\u00e9rit\u00e9s, \u00e0 commencer par celle-ci, qui montre bien ce qu’il faut penser de la folle politique US, dans son d\u00e9cha\u00eenement aveugle : \u00abIf we really wished America ill we would urge it to carry on with its adventurist policies!\u00bb La remarque concerne la question des antimissiles US (BMD)… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[6570,6496,3435,6572,3107,6571,2730,2609,2804],"class_list":["post-68694","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-antimissiles-ii","tag-bdm","tag-cooperation","tag-douma","tag-euromissiles","tag-kosachev","tag-russie","tag-ue","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68694","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68694"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68694\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68694"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68694"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68694"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}