Les Allemands, ou, dans tous les cas, les conservateurs (CDU) du gouvernement allemand, font une courbe plut\u00f4t rentrante sur la question des antimissiles US. Le ministre de la d\u00e9fense Franz Josef Jung (CDU) est venu hier devant la commission des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res du Parlement Europ\u00e9en dire tout le bien qu’il pense d\u00e9sormais du projet. Simplement, il veut lui donner une connotation europ\u00e9enne, par exemple \u00e0 l’int\u00e9rieur de l’OTAN. Il s’agit d’une belle performance bien significative des tendances europ\u00e9ennes actuelles : la performance est expos\u00e9e par EUObserver<\/em> du 13 avril<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abEurope as whole could profit from US plans to place anti-missile bases in Poland and the Czech republic, while in the long run the EU is heading towards a common army, Germany’s defence minister has said.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWarsaw and Prague on Thursday (12 April) received political backing from the German EU presidency for their controversial plans to host a US defence system aimed at intercepting possible ballistic missiles fired from states such as Iran.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbGermany’s defence minister Franz Josef Jung told members of the European Parliament’s foreign affairs committee that the scheme could play an important protecting role for Europe as a whole, according to press reports.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe threats have changed. We are facing threats related to international terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, proliferation and crisis and conflict situations. We have to react to that, he said expressing support for the defence system.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbMr Jung however said he is confident that an agreement over the issue could be reached with the Kremlin, despite a bellicose Russian air force chief last month saying that Moscow was ready to destroy the installations in Poland and the Czech Republic.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe German politician pleaded for a broad political discussion over the scheme at NATO level, adding that Moscow should be consulted in the framework of the NATO-Russia council.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbWarsaw and Prague have come under criticism for dealing with Washington directly over the scheme, instead of through NATO structures.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbMr Jung said however that the missile shield should benefit Europe as a whole. At the moment, North and Central Europe are protected [by the shield], not southern Europe. In my view that is a mistake.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCette position marque une \u00e9volution de la partie conservatrice du gouvernement, mais correspond en gros, dans ses ambitions, \u00e0 l’appr\u00e9ciation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de Merkel : faire entrer la question du syst\u00e8me antimissiles dans la probl\u00e9matique de l’OTAN, ce que refusent notamment les Polonais et, sans doute, le Pentagone. L’europ\u00e9anisation d’un tel syst\u00e8me pose la question de la d\u00e9cision de l’utilisation. En m\u00eame temps, elle soul\u00e8ve la question de la participation ou pas de l’industrie europ\u00e9enne, voire de la ma\u00eetrise d’uvre de cette industrie dans un tel programme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tBien entendu, comme le rappelle \u00e9galement l’article, la position exprim\u00e9e par Jung n’est pas exactement celle du SPD. Les manuvres des divers partis et tendances se poursuivent (en Allemagne comme ailleurs en Europe) mais cette prise de position semble indiquer que Washington a commenc\u00e9 son offensive de pression sur les Allemands.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 13 avril 2007 \u00e0 17H29<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Les Allemands, ou, dans tous les cas, les conservateurs (CDU) du gouvernement allemand, font une courbe plut\u00f4t rentrante sur la question des antimissiles US. Le ministre de la d\u00e9fense Franz Josef Jung (CDU) est venu hier devant la commission des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res du Parlement Europ\u00e9en dire tout le bien qu’il pense d\u00e9sormais du projet. Simplement,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2748,4056,4591,3998,1035,584,5032],"class_list":["post-68709","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-allemagne","tag-antimissiles","tag-cdu","tag-conservateurs","tag-jung","tag-otan","tag-pe"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68709"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68709\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}