{"id":68716,"date":"2007-04-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-04-16T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/04\/16\/dun-neocon-lautre-de-paul-a-tony\/"},"modified":"2007-04-16T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-04-16T00:00:00","slug":"dun-neocon-lautre-de-paul-a-tony","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/04\/16\/dun-neocon-lautre-de-paul-a-tony\/","title":{"rendered":"D&rsquo;un <em>neocon<\/em> l&rsquo;autre, \u2014 de Paul \u00e0 Tony ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Autre aspect de l&rsquo;affaire Wolfowitz, des ambitions personnelles ou des manuvres nationales sous-tendant de possibles et importants effets politiques. Un aspect du texte de Larry Elliott, du <em>Guardian<\/em> de <a href=\"http:\/\/business.guardian.co.uk\/story\/0,,2057897,00.html\" class=\"gen\">ce matin<\/a>, comment\u00e9 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3900\" class=\"gen\">par ailleurs<\/a> sur notre site, nous en donne un exemple int\u00e9ressant. Il s&rsquo;agit de la fin du texte, des derniers mots du texte, point d&rsquo;interrogation compris, le tout soulign\u00e9 par nous pour la commodit\u00e9 de la chose.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The way forward is obvious. The Europeans should make it clear they would veto an unsuitable Bush nomination for the Bank, and to make things easier they should give up the right to nominate the next managing director of the IMF. That would give Bush the chance to nominate someone to the job who was non-American but who had a commitment to development and was liked by the White House.<\/em> <strong><em>Tony Blair, perhaps?<\/em><\/strong>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEffectivement, quelques bons esprits pensent au remplacement de Wolfowitz, au cas o\u00f9 celui-ci quitterait tout de m\u00eame ses fonctions. Les hypoth\u00e8ses ont une tr\u00e8s forte charge politique, et particuli\u00e8rement celle-ci, de Larry Elliott. Les liens entre le <em>Guardian<\/em> et le parti travailliste font croire que l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se n&rsquo;est pas gratuite ou de simple logique sp\u00e9culative.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa question qui se pose est de savoir s&rsquo;il faut appr\u00e9cier cette hypoth\u00e8se d&rsquo;un point de vue \u00e9conomique ou d&rsquo;un point de vue politique,  ou les deux?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  D&rsquo;un point de vue \u00e9conomique, il s&rsquo;agirait d&rsquo;europ\u00e9aniser le syst\u00e8me financier international. Il s&rsquo;agit \u00e9videmment d&rsquo;une d\u00e9marche cosm\u00e9tique quant \u00e0 l&rsquo;orientation (le radicalisme de Blair vaut bien celui de Wolfowitz, ainsi que son pro-am\u00e9ricanisme), mais d&rsquo;une d\u00e9marche avantageuse pour l&rsquo;image du Royaume-Uni et pour la fa\u00e7ade internationaliste et humanitariste qu&rsquo;aime \u00e0 se donner le parti travailliste.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t  D&rsquo;un point de vue politique, il s&rsquo;agirait de se d\u00e9barrasser de l&rsquo;encombrant Tony Blair. Dans l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se gracieuse d&rsquo;un d\u00e9part rapide de Wolfowitz, il s&rsquo;agirait d&rsquo;un d\u00e9part anticip\u00e9 de Tony Blair du 10 Downing Street par rapport aux pr\u00e9visions disponibles (d\u00e9part fin juin), qui arrangerait bien le parti travailliste.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 16 avril 2007 \u00e0 14H45<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Autre aspect de l&rsquo;affaire Wolfowitz, des ambitions personnelles ou des manuvres nationales sous-tendant de possibles et importants effets politiques. Un aspect du texte de Larry Elliott, du Guardian de ce matin, comment\u00e9 par ailleurs sur notre site, nous en donne un exemple int\u00e9ressant. Il s&rsquo;agit de la fin du texte, des derniers mots du texte,&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5113,705,3851,3216,1448],"class_list":["post-68716","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-banque","tag-blair","tag-mondiale","tag-neocon","tag-wolfowitz"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68716","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68716"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68716\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68716"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68716"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68716"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}