{"id":68720,"date":"2007-04-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-04-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/04\/17\/confirme-la-navy-ne-veut-pas-dattaque-de-liran\/"},"modified":"2007-04-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-04-17T00:00:00","slug":"confirme-la-navy-ne-veut-pas-dattaque-de-liran","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/04\/17\/confirme-la-navy-ne-veut-pas-dattaque-de-liran\/","title":{"rendered":"Confirm\u00e9 : la Navy ne veut pas d’attaque de l’Iran"},"content":{"rendered":"

Confirm\u00e9 : la Navy ne veut pas d’attaque de l’Iran<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

La mode semble aujourd’hui \u00eatre pass\u00e9e de l’annonce d’une attaque imminente et par surprise de l’Iran au d\u00e9menti de toute attaque imminente et par surprise contre l’Iran. Il s’agit cette fois d’une d\u00e9claration du chef d’\u00e9tat-major de l’US Navy (CNO ou Chief of Naval Operations), l’amiral Michael Mullen, en visite au Pakistan. Ses d\u00e9clarations, de loin les plus explicites et les plus d\u00e9taill\u00e9es sur cette question et dans ce sens pour un chef militaire (\u00e0 part peut-\u00eatre celles du g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Pace<\/a>, pr\u00e9sident du Comit\u00e9 des Chefs d’Etat-Major), confirment le peu de goût<\/a> de l’U.S. Navy pour une \u00e9ventuelle attaque contre l’Iran.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

D’autre part, il faut noter la pr\u00e9cision des propos (\u00ab\u00a0pas de plan d’attaque\u00a0\u00bb) qui constituent, dans l’esprit de la chose, une certaine contradiction des affirmations des chefs civils de l’administration, notamment de Dick Cheney avec l’affirmation sempiternelle du \u00ab\u00a0toutes les options sont sur la table\u00a0\u00bb .<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Selon Spacewar.com<\/em> du 16 avril<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

«The United States has no plans to attack Iran and its beefed-up naval presence in the Gulf region is meant to keep the area peaceful, the chief of US naval operations said Monday. Admiral Michael Mullen, who is visiting key US ally Pakistan for talks with officials, said efforts were focused on a diplomatic solution to resolve the ongoing row over Tehran’s nuclear programme.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»\u00ab\u00a0There is no plan for an attack on Iran,\u00a0\u00bb Mullen told reporters after the talks.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»\u00ab\u00a0We’ve had a strong naval presence in this part of the world for many, many decades. We recently added some ships that are meant to provide reassurances to our friends, to show continued commitment to the area,\u00a0\u00bb Mullen said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

»\u00ab\u00a0This is a vital region and the goal is to provide the strength and stability that we need to ensure that it remains quiet and peaceful. So there is absolutely no plan that I am aware of that involves an attack on Iran.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em>»<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 17 avril 2001 \u00e0 12H52<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Confirm\u00e9 : la Navy ne veut pas d’attaque de l’Iran La mode semble aujourd’hui \u00eatre pass\u00e9e de l’annonce d’une attaque imminente et par surprise de l’Iran au d\u00e9menti de toute attaque imminente et par surprise contre l’Iran. Il s’agit cette fois d’une d\u00e9claration du chef d’\u00e9tat-major de l’US Navy (CNO ou Chief of Naval Operations),… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2870,2773,5751,3319,2671],"class_list":["post-68720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-attaque","tag-iran","tag-muellen","tag-navy","tag-us"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68720\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}