{"id":68746,"date":"2007-04-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-04-27T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/04\/27\/les-russes-se-durcissent-un-peu-plus-face-a-louest-bien-plus-divise-sur-les-antimissiles-us-quon-necrit\/"},"modified":"2007-04-27T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2007-04-27T00:00:00","slug":"les-russes-se-durcissent-un-peu-plus-face-a-louest-bien-plus-divise-sur-les-antimissiles-us-quon-necrit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2007\/04\/27\/les-russes-se-durcissent-un-peu-plus-face-a-louest-bien-plus-divise-sur-les-antimissiles-us-quon-necrit\/","title":{"rendered":"Les Russes se durcissent un peu plus face \u00e0 l’Ouest, \u2014 bien plus divis\u00e9 sur les antimissiles US qu’on n’\u00e9crit"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’annonce par Poutine que la Russie envisage un retrait du trait\u00e9 CFE (moratoire sur les forces conventionnelles en Europe) n’a pas grande importance strat\u00e9gique. Le trait\u00e9 CFE n’apporte gu\u00e8re de contraintes ou bien il n’est gu\u00e8re respect\u00e9 ; dans tous les cas, ce trait\u00e9 de la fin de la Guerre froide n’a gu\u00e8re d’importance dans la situation strat\u00e9gique actuelle.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSelon le Guardian<\/em> du 26 avril<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abUnder the treaty signed by the former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1990, Russia agreed to scrap much of its military hardware in Europe, and limit the number of troops stationed on its northern and southern flanks.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbToday analysts said Mr Putin’s move probably would not make much difference to Russia’s military capacities, but it would allow Russian generals to carry out exercises without informing their western counterparts and keep Russian troops in the disputed breakaway regions of Georgia and Moldova.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbMr Putin is trying to put the ball back in America’s court, said Sergei Karaganov, the deputy director of Moscow’s Institute of European Studies. The whole treaty was over-ideologised and cold war-ish. It was an idiotic military-political idea from beginning to end.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tPolitiquement, par contre, c’est tout diff\u00e9rent. L’annonce de Poutine constitue sans aucun doute un durcissement de sa position vis-\u00e0-vis de l’OTAN et, surtout, des USA. Le cas \u00e9vident ici est celui des antimissiles US<\/a> en Europe. Poutine mentionne dans son discours (adresse annuelle sur l’\u00e9tat de la nation) que ce d\u00e9ploiement est sans aucun doute une grave menace pour la Russie, et sera consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme tel.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe m\u00eame article du Guardian<\/em> signale une interview du n\u00b02 des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res allemand, signalant que le soi-disant bloc europ\u00e9en derri\u00e8re les USA, bloc selon la presse MSM<\/a>, est en r\u00e9alit\u00e9 plein de fissures discr\u00e8tes mais certaines, avec au moins six pays de l’OTAN ayant de s\u00e9rieuses r\u00e9serves sur le projet. Il s’agit de r\u00e9serves qui n’ont pas encore \u00e9t\u00e9 officiellement act\u00e9es, mais simplement \u00e9voqu\u00e9es lors de la r\u00e9union informelle du 19.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tThe Bush administration has this week been struggling to convince sceptical European partners that the missile shield is a good idea.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbIn an interview yesterday, Germany’s deputy foreign minister, Gernot Erler, revealed that at least six allies, including Germany, raised doubts about the project at a Nato meeting last week amid fears of another cold war on European soil.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 27 avril 2007 \u00e0 01H16<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’annonce par Poutine que la Russie envisage un retrait du trait\u00e9 CFE (moratoire sur les forces conventionnelles en Europe) n’a pas grande importance strat\u00e9gique. Le trait\u00e9 CFE n’apporte gu\u00e8re de contraintes ou bien il n’est gu\u00e8re respect\u00e9 ; dans tous les cas, ce trait\u00e9 de la fin de la Guerre froide n’a gu\u00e8re d’importance dans… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4056,6620,6621,6484,2890,4495],"class_list":["post-68746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-antimissiles","tag-cfe","tag-durcissement","tag-euromissiles-ii","tag-russes","tag-traite"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68746"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68746\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}